Change for Children Strategy
Download Change for Children
Read Change for Children online
Plain English summary
Change for Children - Plain English summary version (Word)
Change for Children - Plain English summary version (PDF)
Easy Read
Change for Children
Change for Children: Tasmania’s 10-year strategy for upholding the rights of children by preventing, identifying and responding to child sexual abuse
Support
Content in this strategy may raise issues of concern for some readers. Child sexual abuse is a challenging issue. We encourage readers to exercise self-care in engaging with this content and seek support and care if required. If you need support, a range of free and confidential support services are available by phone and/or face-to-face.
If you need to talk to someone, you can contact:
State-wide Sexual Assault Support Line
24/7 support from local specialist counsellors provided by the Sexual Assault Support Service (SASS) and Laurel House: 1800 697 877 (1800 MY SUPPORT)
Lifeline - 24/7 Crisis support: 13 11 14
A Tasmanian Lifeline - 8am-8pm, 365 days a year: 1800 98 44 34 for support and referral
13 Yarn - 24/7: 13 92 76 - crisis support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
Relationships Australia Tasmania
Specialist complex trauma counselling, trauma informed counselling, wellbeing information and referral
9am-5pm, Monday to Friday: 1300 364 277
24/7 support for children and young people provided by specialist counsellors: 1800 55 1800
A comprehensive list of additional supports is available in Appendix 1.
Reporting child sexual abuse
If you believe or suspect that a child is at risk, you must report it.
For an emergency where there is immediate risk of harm or a crime is happening now, contact police on 000.
For advice or to refer an abuse matter, contact the Advice and Referral Line on 1800 000 123.
Where a crime may have been committed, contact police on 131 144 or Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.
Visit the Tell Someone website tellsomeone.tas.gov.au for more information about recognising the signs of child sexual abuse.
Dedication
Change for Children is dedicated to all victims of child sexual abuse – those who have survived, and those who have lost their lives.
The victim-survivors, whistleblowers and advocates involved in the Commission of Inquiry into the Tasmanian Government’s Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Institutional Settings are the true change-makers and champions for children.
The Tasmanian Government acknowledges the profound trauma that affects victim-survivors of child sexual abuse and their families, caregivers, advocates and supporters. This trauma can be lifelong.
As ongoing custodians of the public institutions that failed to protect children from harm, the Tasmanian Government and its administrating agencies are deeply sorry.
The Tasmanian Government honours and respectfully remembers the victims of child sexual abuse who are sadly no longer with us.
In their memory and for all victim-survivors we commit to real change.
Acknowledgment of Aboriginal People and Country
Change for Children acknowledges Tasmanian Aboriginal people as the traditional owners and ongoing custodians of Tasmania and pay our respects to Elders past and present.
Caring for Country is caring for children and young people. This connection to Country, culture and community supports the wellbeing of today’s children and the children of tomorrow.
We acknowledge the institutional betrayal of Tasmanian Aboriginal people caused by colonisation, dispossession, discrimination and the forced removal of children from their families[1].
We acknowledge and are committed to taking urgent and positive action, in partnership with Tasmanian Aboriginal people, to remedy the disproportionate over-representation of Aboriginal children and young people who have lived, are living with or who remain at risk of child sexual abuse.
Thank you to contributors
We sincerely appreciate the contributions of the over 450 Tasmanians involved in developing this strategy.
This builds on the many Tasmanians who came forward and shared their expertise with the Commission of Inquiry and the reviews that pre-dated it.
We particularly wish to acknowledge the people and groups representing the interests and experiences of:
- Victim-survivors of child sexual abuse
- Families, caregivers, supporters, friends and advocates of victim-survivors
- Children and young people
- Tasmanian Aboriginal people
- People with disability
- Culturally and linguistically diverse people
- LGBTIQA+ people
- Specialist sexual violence support services
- Frontline workers and other child safety experts
- Researchers and subject matter experts.
We would also like to thank the people who attended a workshop in November 2024 and assisted in the development and co-design of the framework for this strategy, which included representatives from:
- Department of Justice Lived Experience Advisory Panel members
- Specialist sexual violence support services
- Community and local government sectors
- Commissioner for Children and Young People
- National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse
- Relevant Tasmanian Government agencies, including child safety-related regulators.
We would also like to thank all the participants who attended the regional and online workshops in late 2024 and provided feedback on Change for Children, including peak bodies of diverse population groups, the community sector, specialist services and relevant government agencies.
Without your wisdom and knowledge, we could not have developed this strategy to inspire and achieve real and lasting change to keep children safe.
Message from the Premier
Many people have shared stories with me and I am acutely aware of the profound impact that child sexual abuse has on individuals, families, and communities. The Commission of Inquiry into the Tasmanian Government’s Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Institutional Settings (Commission of Inquiry) has demonstrated the depth and breadth of the impact of child sexual abuse. Addressing this issue is a critical priority for our Government. It is our moral duty to protect our children, support victim-survivors and create a safe, nurturing environment where they can grow, learn, work and thrive without fear.
The haunting question, "Who was looking after me?" was repeatedly asked in the Commission of Inquiry. This strategy responds to that question—an unequivocal statement that such failures must never happen again. This question, raised by victim-survivors of child sexual abuse and their families, embodies feelings of abandonment and betrayal. No child, nor any adult reflecting on their childhood, should ever feel that their safety and wellbeing were neglected.
At its heart, Change for Children is a plan for meaningful change. It commits to upholding the rights of all children, centring the voices of victim-survivors, and ensuring that every child is safe from child sexual abuse. While the focus of the Commission of Inquiry was on Government institutions, this strategy acknowledges that child sexual abuse often occurs in homes, and so, the broader attitudes and beliefs about children's rights that Tasmanians hold must be addressed. Our approach is embedded in the principles of prevention, protection, support, and justice. This multi-faceted approach will seek not only to prevent abuse from occurring but also to support victim-survivors in their healing journey and ensure that perpetrators are held to account.
The Commission of Inquiry’s findings have exposed profound and widespread failings in the care and protection of children in Tasmanian institutions, highlighting a system that was fragmented and, at times, dysfunctional. The voices of victim-survivors reflect not only their pain and trauma but also the long-lasting impact on future generations. This strategy recognises these past failures and seeks to strengthen a system that protects children, values the expertise of victim-survivors, and listens to their stories.
The development of the Change for Children Strategy is a foundational action taken by the Tasmanian Government in response to the Commission of Inquiry report and demonstrates a commitment to accountability and transparency moving forward. This strategy emphasises the Tasmanian Government’s responsibility to implement all 191 recommendations from the Commission of Inquiry and related reviews to ensure that the mistakes of the past are not repeated.
This strategy is a call for action across the Tasmanian community. It represents a partnership between the Tasmanian Government, other tiers of government, community organisations, and all stakeholders to drive sustained change. This strategy not only commits to protecting children but also empowers adults, especially those who have survived abuse, to contribute to a future where no child is left to wonder, "Who is looking after me?"
The wellbeing of our children is at the heart of this strategy. We must honour the courage of victim-survivors who have shared their stories and work tirelessly to prevent any child from suffering child sexual abuse. Our Government stands united in the pursuit of a Tasmania where every child can feel and is safe, respected, and valued.
To the victim-survivors, families, and advocates who have shaped this strategy, I thank you. Your voices and experiences are the foundation of our collective approach, and together, we are taking a stand to protect our children and create a brighter future for all Tasmanians.
Jeremy Rockliff MP
Premier of Tasmania
Enduring Statement of Intent
The Tasmanian Government, and future governments, are accountable to the people of Tasmania through the Parliament of Tasmania.
The Tasmanian Government will act with intent, and ensure:
- children and young people of today and tomorrow are safe
- the rights of all children and young people to be safe, listened to and respected are upheld in all places where children engage with the Government and its service
- all parts of the system that children and young people interact and engage with are supported to ensure the failures of the past are not repeated
- communities know that children and young people must be safe in their homes, and that knowledge is shared and strengthened with their families and caregivers
- victim-survivors and their families are engaged with and listened to as change is prioritised and implemented.
The Tasmanian Government and governments of the future will work in partnership with community organisations and specialist services and act with sustained transparency to make change for children and young people.
How to read this strategy
‘One resounding call has emerged: A demand for change’[2]
The Change for Children 10-year strategy takes an important step forward in fulfilling commitments to keep children safe in Tasmania. These include delivering on the recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry, upholding the rights of all children, and centring and believing the voices of victim-survivors to ensure that children and young people are safe now and into the future.
Over time, this strategy and associated action plans will assist in transforming Government institutions and the system they comprise. The development of a child sexual abuse strategy and action plans to address institutional child sexual abuse in Tasmania was a key recommendation of the Commission of Inquiry (recommendation 19.1). But Change for Children goes beyond this, acknowledging that most child sexual abuse happens in homes, not institutions. This strategy details how the Tasmanian community can work together towards a state where all children and young people are safe from child sexual abuse.
This strategy is comprised of two interrelated parts:
- it starts with the purpose of this strategy, including our vision, objectives, long-term outcomes, principles, and focus on child-rights. Some of the evidence on the impacts of child sexual abuse, risks and drivers, and intersection between child sexual abuse and family and sexual violence which has informed our approach is detailed in Appendix 4.
- it then details our approach to implementing this strategy, including our public health and socioecological framework, Theory of Change, accountabilities for reform, and how we will know we are making a difference.
At the core of Change for Children is the recognition that to effectively address child sexual abuse in Tasmania we need a coordinated government and community effort to shift the conditions which have held the problem of child sexual abuse in place. This will ensure the failings of the past, both within and outside of institutions, are not repeated.
Change for Children builds on the Government’s Response to the Commission of Inquiry, Keeping Children Safe and Rebuilding Trust, which outlined agency responsibilities and timing for implementing recommendations. It outlines how we can work together to achieve the holistic, community-wide change needed to keep children safe. It also includes terminology and concepts (see Appendix 2) and an overview of the relevant policy landscape (see Appendix 3).
Work is happening across Australia to prevent, identify and respond to child sexual abuse. This work follows the findings of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (Royal Commission) and, more recently through the implementation of the National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2021-2030 (National Strategy). Change for Children seeks to complement this work and provides the framework for Tasmania’s ongoing commitment to the National Strategy.
Change for Children is not only a call for change but a plan for change. It moves the Tasmanian Government, its agencies, and community organisations forward in our commitment, recognising that significant reform is already underway but that much more work remains to be done.
Meanings matter
“It is important that the government and leaders normalise talking about child sexual abuse so that parents and other adults who have influence in the lives of children are alert to the fact that child sexual abuse is common and that all adults need to listen to and support children.”
— Victim-survivor, Laurel House consultation survey participant[3]
The right words can educate and empower but attaching inappropriate or incomplete meanings to words and concepts can silence and stigmatise.
Meanings matter: a complete list of terms and their meanings is available in Appendix 2. Where possible and applicable to the Tasmanian context, this strategy adopts the most current terminology used by the National Office for Child Safety and is aligned with the National Strategy to assist in monitoring and evaluation.[4]
The most common terms used in this strategy are below.
- 'Child sexual abuse' is any act that exposes a child or young person to, or involves a child or young person in, sexual activities that:
- they do not understand
- they do not or cannot consent to
- are not accepted by the community or
- are unlawful.[5]
- 'Children and young people' are people under the age of 18.[6]
- 'Harmful sexual behaviours' are behaviours displayed by children and young people that fall outside what may be considered developmentally typical or socially appropriate, and cause harm to themselves or others. When these behaviours involve others, they may include a lack of consent, reciprocity, mutuality, and may involve the use of coercion, shame, force, or a misuse of power. Harmful sexual behaviours evoke worry about the development and wellbeing of the child, young person, or others involved, and where they involve other children or young people, the behaviours may cause significant harm and may be experienced as abusive by other children and young people involved. Harmful sexual behaviours may include illegal behaviours that require a criminal justice response. Harmful sexual behaviours can occur in any setting, including in person and online.[7]
- 'Institutional child sexual abuse' is abuse that occurs within, is enabled by or attributable to the premises, action, inaction, activities or operations of a government or non-government organisation and/or its paid/unpaid workers in the course of or in connection with their duties.
- 'Tasmanian Aboriginal people' is used throughout Change for Children to recognise and identify Aboriginal people who are the cultural and rightful custodians through ancestry, cultural lore, and connections to the songlines of Tasmania before the arrival of Western culture.
- 'Aboriginal people in Tasmania' refers to all Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people who live in Tasmania, regardless of their origin. Their ancestors, cultural lore and songlines may be from mainland Australia, and they are part of the Tasmanian Aboriginal community.
- 'Victim-survivor' refers to someone who has experienced sexual abuse as a child or young person.
What is the purpose of this strategy?
“If there were better systems, my abuse could have been prevented. We're not the only family where there's been multi-generational access for perpetrators. It is not inevitable; it does not have to be inevitable.”
— Participant, Sexual Assault Support Service consultation.[8]
The Change for Children 10-year strategy recognises the complexity of the issue of child sexual abuse. The Tasmanian Government will work in partnership with all levels of government, community organisations and the wider community to implement this strategy through three consecutive action plans, which will be built over time, based on evidence and continual feedback from victim-survivors, children and young people and the community:
- Collaboration for Change 2025-26 – First Action Plan
- Lasting Change 2026-29 – Second Action Plan
- Maintaining the Momentum 2029-34 – Third Action Plan
Our approach emphasises prevention, early intervention, effective response, and long-term recovery while tackling the underlying factors that perpetuate child sexual abuse. This strategy seeks to create meaningful change by fostering a culture of safety, respect, and accountability. It prioritises collaboration, equity, and a trauma-informed lens to ensure that interventions are effective, inclusive, and responsive to the diverse needs of children and young people, victim-survivors, families and communities.
This strategy acknowledges that the Tasmanian Government remains responsible for implementing the Commission of Inquiry recommendations and all related child safety reforms, but recognises that a collective, coordinated effort across the broader community is needed to safeguard children and young people and support victim‑survivors effectively. This strategy details the framework to achieve this.
In Tasmania, reform commenced following the release of the Royal Commission report and has been significantly shaped by the findings of the Commission of Inquiry report recommendations. Reform continues, with the Tasmanian Government allocating significant funding to implement recommendations from the Commission of Inquiry, including $55.1 million for initial reforms in 2023-24, and an additional $425 million in the 2024-25 Budget.[9]
The Commission of Inquiry report made several recommendations for improvements to the child safety system to ensure timely and effective responses to support children and young people as well as victim-survivors. This strategy acknowledges that a strengthened child safety system is integral to keeping children safe.
The Tasmanian Government recognises that the government itself must do things differently so that the mistakes of the past are not repeated. The Commission of Inquiry report told us that change needs to happen at all levels to prevent, identify and respond to child sexual abuse adequately. The Commission of Inquiry report broadly asked government institutions to move:
From | To |
---|---|
Secrecy | Transparency |
Closed institutions | Open institutions |
Narrow, legalistic risk aversion | Curiosity and courage |
Reactive | Proactive |
Patriarchal | Equality of voices and lived experience |
Toxicity and blame shifting | Safety, growth and learning |
Lack of feedback | Constructive feedback |
Biased and defensive | Self-reflective |
Silence and fear | Safety to challenge and speak up |
Adultism | Child-centred |
The child safety system in Tasmania
Change for Children acknowledges that a whole of system change is required to keep children safe from child sexual abuse. Children and young people in Tasmania interact with various services and individuals daily, including government and non-government services. These interactions form a complex child safety system that aims to protect and support children. The system includes the regulatory, criminal or civil justice systems, redress options, health systems, community service organisations and support networks. Figure 1 details this system.

Figure 1: The system[10]
The Tasmanian Government is committed to improving this system, ensuring that all children are safe, supported, and can thrive. A successful, strengthened child safety system will be reflected in reduced instances of child sexual abuse, better access to support services, improved communication between agencies, and increased community trust in the system.
To achieve this, we plan to strengthen collaboration across all levels of government and community service organisations. We recognise all children and young people and victim‑survivors have unique needs and the right to accessible and equitable services. Change for Children emphasises involving children and young people, and victim-survivors to ensure that they are listened to and participate in decisions that impact them.
Key services involved in this system include child safety services, out-of-home care providers both within and outside of government, health services including mental health services, police, and legal authorities, among others.
Implementing the Commission of Inquiry recommended key reforms for safer institutions is one of the ways that the Tasmanian Government has committed to changing the system.
The Commission of Inquiry identified key reforms for safer institutions for children and young people. Change for Children recommits to these reforms including:
- Creating a new, strengthened regulator and advocate for children and young people’s rights and safety to ensure focused and accountable delivery of child safety reforms. All children and young people will have access to consistent, robust safeguards and support systems, enabling them to thrive in safe environments.
- Introducing a more coordinated and statewide response to child sexual abuse and harmful sexual behaviours to ensure that resources, services and support systems are aligned, comprehensive, and accessible. We want a collective and evidence-based approach that keeps children and young people and victim-survivors at the centre.
- Increasing participation of children and young people, victim-survivors and service providers in policy design and delivery to ensure that policies and services are responsive and reflective of the needs and experiences of people who engage with them. We want an inclusive and empowered Tasmania where children and young people’s rights and victim-survivors' wellbeing are at the forefront of decision-making and service provision.
- Introducing stronger mechanisms for institutions to protect children from adults who pose a risk to them, and ensure that institution sare environments where children are safe from harm, and victim-survivors are supported and believed.
- Showing greater care, compassion and investment in protecting and healing marginalised children to ensure that diverse and unique needs are met in environments where they are valued and supported.
- Ensuring staff and volunteers working with children have the knowledge and skills they need to provide safe environments where children and young people are safe from child sexual abuse. By equipping adults with the tools to prevent, identify and respond to child sexual abuse, we can build child safe cultures.
- Valuing and strengthening the skills and expertise of those working in the child safety and youth justice systems to ensure that professionals are equipped to effectively address the diverse needs of all children and young people. A well-supported workforce will prevent harm, support victim-survivors, and promote safety and wellbeing for all children and young people.
- Monitoring reform to ensure that protective measures and systems designed to safeguard children are effectively implemented and continually improved. Tracking progress and identifying gaps ensures that reforms are making the changes needed to keep children safe.
The following section outlines our vision, objectives, long-term outcomes and guiding principles that will guide our efforts to keep children in Tasmania safe from child sexual abuse. It builds on the lessons from the Commission of Inquiry and responds to the extensive and wide-ranging consultation on the draft Strategy.
Change for Children
“Every child needs to be protected, to have the right to feel safe and the foundations to be safe if they are to move forward and thrive in our society. It is the absolute and sole responsibility of every one of us adults to ensure that this happens, and therefore we have to make change.”
— Victim-survivor, Laurel House consultation survey participant.[11]
Vision
This is the aspirational statement that describes the desired future state and is the ultimate aim of this strategy.
In Tasmania, all children and young people are protected and safe from sexual abuse, and all victim-survivors are believed and supported. They are enabled to thrive, and their wellbeing is protected in all places they live, learn, play and work.
Objectives
These are the specific goals we need to work towards, and measure over time, to achieve the vision.
- Children and young people feel listened to, protected, and are aware of who is responsible for their care, have a voice in decisions affecting them, and are encouraged to share their experiences.
- Victim-survivors know who to approach for support, are listened to and believed, have access to diverse support options, and see their disclosures contribute to the safety of others.
- Community organisations receive funding that supports quality services, collaborate with government and other organisations, uphold child rights and safety principles to prevent abuse from occurring and share data responsibly.
- Community members are educated to prevent and recognise signs of abuse, including how to respond and report.
- Government commits to significant and ongoing cultural and systemic change to promote accountability and transparency, to protect the rights of children.
- Staff members and volunteers in government and community organisations commit to listen to and respect children, collaborate to ensure safety, understand the importance of reporting concerns, value victim-survivors' perspectives, and report any concerning behaviour.
Long-term outcomes
These are the measurable results that this strategy is aiming to achieve that were identified in the Theory of Change.
"Rather than having a focus on government and non-government – this is about a whole of community response."
— Workshop participant, Culturally and Linguistically Diverse consultation workshop
- All children and young people in Tasmania are supported to be safe from child sexual abuse.
- Everyone recognises and is empowered to act on systemic and direct risks to child safety.
- Child sexual abuse is prevented through a whole of system effort and approach.
- Adults that commit or enable child sexual abuse are held accountable.
- Organisations are accountable and, where failures have been identified, engage in genuine processes to restore trust, safety and agency.
- Victim-survivors and their families are respected, valued and receive the support they need at all stages of their lives.
- Children and young people have developmentally appropriate and respectful peer relationships.
- All children and young people can meaningfully participate in Tasmanian communities and decisions which affect them.
- A skilled, sustainable, and resourced workforce acts to prevent and respond to child sexual abuse across all relevant sectors.
Guiding Principles
These are the core values that will inform and guide the implementation, and evaluation of this strategy.
“Since most sexual abuse of children happens within the family or extended family, the government needs to have sufficiently trained people to handle this and prevent the family going into 'close-down' mode and 'pretend it didn't happen mode' in order to protect the family image.”
— Survey respondent, Sexual Assault Support Service consultation survey[12]
Tasmanians are committed to community-wide efforts to protect children's rights and prevent child sexual abuse. The goal is to prevent and respond to abuse in a trauma‑informed and victim-centred way, as described by victim-survivors and children and young people.
The focus for this strategy is to outline our long-term whole-of-Tasmania response to prevent and respond to child sexual abuse in all settings, including:
- in organisations and government agencies (institutions)
- in communities by family members, acquaintances, or other adults
- in communities by other children and young people
- online.
Our approach is underpinned by the following guiding principles:
- Child safety in Tasmania is everyone’s responsibility, and everyone has a role in preventing child sexual abuse.
- The inherent rights of children must be recognised and upheld in all settings.
- Children and young people and victim-survivors must be acknowledged and respected as experts in their experience.
- Equity must be upheld for the diversity of children and young people and victim-survivors and their intersecting experiences of disadvantage must be acknowledged and respected.
- Families hold a key role in promoting the safety, wellbeing and rights of their children and young people and supporting families in need who may be at greater risk.
- Local governments and community organisations already play a key role in upholding child safety and wellbeing, so are essential partners in building and maintaining child safe communities and are well-placed to engage early with children and their families.
- All system components are integrated, including the child safety system, to prevent and respond to child sexual abuse effectively.
- Government is transparent and accountable in upholding children's rights, centring victim-survivor experiences and actively engaging with victim-survivors about their experiences.
- Evidence, data, research and evaluation informs our policies, programs, actions and reforms.
Upholding children's rights
“When it comes to circumstances where the child thinks it’s their fault for whatever’s happened, you need to do your best to make sure they understand that it’s not, no matter the circumstance, you know, nothing is ever going to be the child’s fault in that sort of circumstance.”
— Participant, Commissioner for Children and Young People, 'Start the Conversation'[13]
In Australia, children’s rights are recognised through legislation at both national and state levels, aligning with the principles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (the Convention), to which Australia is a signatory. In Australia, these articles serve as a crucial framework, guiding legislation and initiatives aimed at protecting our children and young people from all forms of sexual abuse and exploitation. These rights are subject to state laws which shape children's rights in practice (see Appendix 3).
The four general principles that underpin how the Convention should be interpreted and put into practice are:
- Participation: Children have the right to express their views freely on matters affecting them and to have those views respected.
- Right to survival and development: Children must be allowed to survive and thrive physically, emotionally, socially, and intellectually.
- Non-discrimination: All children have equal rights without exception.
- Best interests of the child: The child’s wellbeing and safety are the primary consideration in all actions concerning them.
We listened to young people from the Youth Network of Tasmania and Premier's Youth Advisory Council in December 2024 about what upholding their rights means to them. Their thoughts are captured below.
Rights to participation means to:
- express themselves, without fear of judgment: to be listened to and taken seriously, and to have their concerns acted on.
- influence decision-making on things that affect young people.
- access accurate information that is relevant.
- give feedback: express it and have it listened to.
- share views with a trusted adult.
Rights to survival and development means to:
- receive love and support: from family first, and if that fails then networks. If that fails, the State needs to get involved.
- be secure and safe: people should always feel safe within their school, home, online, out in the community and workplace. Everyone should be protected from violence and abuse.
- have access to services.
Rights to non-discrimination means:
- everyone should have the same rights no matter what their background.
Rights to the best interests of the child means to have:
- freedom of self-autonomy to make decisions about their own lives.
- adults that are willing to listen and take action to ensure the safety and wellbeing of children and young people have a place to express their needs.
- access to an independent person to talk to when in need of support.
Since Australia ratified the Convention in 1990, there has been a significant shift toward recognising that children possess inherent rights and are entitled to protections to ensure their safety and wellbeing. These developments point to changes in community attitudes and awareness of child sexual abuse and the rights of children over time – from minimal awareness, where child sexual abuse was ignored or ‘covered up’, toward the growing understanding of child sexual abuse as not only a criminal issue but a societal one requiring collective action.[14]
The Convention outlines 54 specific protection rights for children. Change for Children focuses on upholding Article 34 which focuses on protection from sexual abuse:
Article 34 mandates that all signatory countries, including Australia, undertake all appropriate measures to prevent the exploitation and abuse of children in all its forms.
The Tasmanian Government’s acceptance of all recommendations made by the Commission of Inquiry represents a significant commitment to protect and uphold the rights and safety of children by preventing, identifying and responding to child sexual abuse.
Implementing this strategy and other intersecting reforms and policies will strengthen children’s rights to ensure their safety and participation. Some of the key reforms underway to uphold and protect children’s right to safety include:
- establishment of a new Commission for Children and Young People, supported by new Commissioners and advocates for children and young people’s rights and safety (recommendation 9.38).
- introduction of Tasmanian Child and Youth Safe Standards and Universal Principle to improve practices and standards to safeguard children in organisational settings (see page 62 for more information on how the Standards align with the Convention).
- development of empowerment and participation strategies for children and young people in vulnerable settings such as out-of-home care and youth detention (recommendations 9.6 and 12.8).
This strategy is also informed by the Tasmanian Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy: It Takes a Tasmanian Village. Change for Children emphasises the 10 Principles co‑designed by Tasmanian children and informed by the Convention.
Tasmanian Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy, It Takes a Tasmanian Village principles:
- Acknowledging that the family and extended family of the child has the primary responsibility for the care, upbringing and development of their child/children and to provide them with information to access available services which will assist in providing a nurturing environment for their children.
- Providing opportunities for Tasmanian Aboriginal children and young people to connect to community and country and working in partnership with Tasmanian Aboriginal people to ensure life outcomes for Tasmanian Aboriginal children and young people are equal to all Tasmanian children and youth.
- Understanding the varying relationships that influence each child and young person we work with.
- Providing the opportunity for, and supporting, children and young people to have a voice in decisions that affect them.
- Providing a range of education and training opportunities to ensure children and young people can participate in life-long learning and employment.
- Recognising the individuality of children and young people and treating them without discrimination and with respect.
- Providing children and young people opportunities to explore topics that interest them in a manner that supports learning and reduces anxiety.
- Providing a range of recreational and social opportunities for children and young people in the areas in which they live.
- Fulfilling our preventative and statutory responsibilities against all forms of violence against children and young people.
- Supporting positive mental and physical health outcomes for children and young people in a way that aligns with the Government’s Tasmania Statement on Working Together for the Health and Wellbeing of all Tasmanians.
Why do we need a strategy?
What is the prevalence of child sexual abuse?
“Abuse today is very social media, it’s very faceless”
— Young male participant, Commissioner for Children and Young People Tasmania ‘Start the Conversation’[15]
Child sexual abuse is more prevalent than many of us realise. Recent data shows that child sexual abuse is widespread among Australians. It is estimated that:
- Over 1 in 4 Australians aged 16 years and over have experienced child sexual abuse (29 per cent).
- More than 1 in 3 girls experience child sexual abuse.
- Almost 1 in 5 boys experience child sexual abuse.
- Females are nearly twice as likely to have experienced child sexual abuse than males (37 per cent compared to 19 per cent).
- Most victim-survivors of child sexual abuse said it happened more than one time (78 per cent).
- On average it took victim-survivors of child sexual abuse 24 years to disclose the abuse to anyone.[16]
Tasmanian data on child abuse reported to police shows that the number of victims of sexual abuse under 18 years is rising, with 260 offences in 2014 compared to 313 in 2023.[17] We know these statistics under-report the extent of child sexual abuse, which often goes undisclosed for many years.
Research and data show that child sexual abuse does not only happen in institutions and most occurs outside of this context. In a study of people who experienced sexual abuse before they were 15 years old, 79 per cent were abused by a relative, friend, acquaintance or neighbour.[18]
Abuse may be in-person or online. When online, children are at an increased risk of being exposed to harmful content, unwanted contact from strangers, grooming and sextortion.[19] Reports of online child sexual exploitation have increased by over 200 per cent since 2018.[20]
What do we believe about child sexual abuse?
“Supporting communities to be empowered so that children have a sense of autonomy in speaking out.”
— Workshop participant, Culturally and Linguistically Diverse consultation workshop
The Government Response to the Commission of Inquiry included a commitment to over-sample Tasmanian data in the 2023 Australian Child Sexual Abuse Attitudes, Knowledge and Response Study.[21]
Tasmanian respondents to the survey demonstrated high levels of knowledge and awareness about child sexual abuse as a prevalent and important social issue:
- 100 per cent had heard of the term child sexual abuse
- 64 per cent had heard the term ‘harmful sexual behaviour’ (significantly higher than the national average), and
- more Tasmanians correctly recognised residential settings as the riskiest locations for child sexual abuse than other jurisdictions.
A significantly higher proportion of Tasmanians reported that they were likely/very likely/certain to know someone who was sexually abused as a child (81 per cent) or had received a disclosure of child sexual abuse from an adult (50 per cent) than other jurisdictions. 88 per cent agreed that there are things we can do as a community to reduce the number of children sexually abused.
However, the data showed that there are still some gaps in Tasmanians’ knowledge and ability to respond:
- 50 per cent were not confident or only slightly confident they could recognise the signs a child had been sexually abused, and
- only 54 per cent reported that they know what to do to keep children safe from sexual abuse.
Some respondents held problematic views towards child sexual abuse victims, and although not widespread the Tasmanian data showed that:
- about one in five (22 per cent) did not agree that children should always be believed if they disclose that they are a victim of sexual abuse, and
- almost one-quarter (24 per cent) considered (agreed/strongly agreed) that older children have a responsibility to actively resist adults’ sexual advances.
What is our approach?
“Where do we begin? I personally feel it will take a complete overhaul of the current systems (that I truly believe don't work), from the top to the bottom and from the bottom to the top...”
— Participant, Sexual Assault Support Service consultation[22]
Child sexual abuse is a complex issue that needs a comprehensive and coordinated response. It is a challenging societal issue with far-reaching consequences for the health, wellbeing, and development of children and young people and communities. Importantly, child sexual abuse is preventable.
This strategy incorporates a combination of approaches to address the complex nature of the problem with children and young people and victim-survivors at the centre. These approaches inform policy responses, the framework and place-based initiatives, as seen in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Summary of our overarching approach
Systems thinking expands the range of choices available for solving a problem by broadening our thinking and helping us articulate problems in new and different ways. Systems thinking methods and tools inform the underlying policy approach for the strategy and have been used to develop the Theory of Change, objectives and principles for this strategy and identify the underlying causes.
This strategy incorporates public health and socioecological approaches to inform how we will prevent, identify and respond to child sexual abuse across the Tasmanian community. These approaches recognise that child sexual abuse is influenced by a range of interconnected factors, from individual vulnerabilities to broader social, cultural, and environmental contexts. By adopting these approaches, this strategy goes beyond addressing the immediate but essential needs of victim-survivors and their families. It aims to tackle the causes of child sexual abuse, strengthen protective factors, and foster a culture of respect, safety, and accountability across all levels of society.
A public health approach is an integrated approach built on the principles of population health, equity, and collaboration across sectors.[23] It prioritises preventing abuse, intervening early when risks or incidents are identified, and supporting victim-survivors in recovery and healing:
- Primary prevention: focuses on stopping child sexual abuse before it occurs by addressing root causes and risk factors as child sexual abuse is preventable.
- Early intervention: targets at-risk children and families to mitigate harm and prevent escalation.
- Response: ensures an effective and trauma-informed reaction to child sexual abuse disclosures or discoveries and ensures perpetrators are held accountable.
- Recovery and healing: supports victim-survivors and their families to heal and rebuild their lives.
The socioecological approach provides a way to understand factors contributing to child sexual abuse at multiple levels:
- Individual: characteristics of the victim-survivor or perpetrator, such as age, gender, psychological health, history of trauma, or behaviours that may increase vulnerability or risk.
- Relationships: the influence of close social connections, including family, peers, or intimate relationships, that impact the likelihood of abuse occurring or being prevented.
- Organisations: institutional environments, such as schools, workplaces, religious organisations, and youth programs, and their policies, practices, and culture that either protect against or fail to prevent abuse.
- Law and policy: legal frameworks, regulations, and policies at a local, state, national, or international level that define, prevent, or address child sexual abuse, including reporting mechanisms and punishment for perpetrators.
- Community: neighbourhoods, social networks, and community norms, including factors like social cohesion, accessibility of resources, and cultural attitudes toward abuse and protection of children.
- Society: broader societal factors, such as cultural norms, economic conditions, media influences, and systemic inequalities shape attitudes, behaviours, and the prevalence of abuse.
The following figure explores the cascading repercussions and/or impacts of child sexual abuse across the multiple levels of socioecological factors (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Socioecological model and cascading impacts of child sexual abuse
Table 1 uses a matrix approach to demonstrate how the elements of a public health approach and socioecological factors interrelate. This matrix brings together the levels of prevention, multiple levels of socioecological factors and the range of broad initiatives which we have situated according to their ‘best fit’ in this framework.

Table 1: Summary of how public health approach can inform responses child sexual abuse across socioecological domains [24]
Further, this strategy also emphasises a place-based approach to inform a tailored and context-sensitive framework for child sexual abuse prevention and response. This will ensure the response to child sexual abuse is integrated with local social initiatives and supports community empowerment. Place-based ways of working recognise:
- A localised understanding of risk: recognising that child sexual abuse risk factors vary across communities. These risks are influenced by social norms, structural inequalities, child-rights and participation and local community and institutional practices. These risk factors can make some settings more vulnerable than others to child sexual abuse.
- Using existing established relationships and networks: recognising the transformative power of relationships to influence, shape and maintain changes in cultural attitudes, beliefs and actions. Using existing networks and understanding the community ensures approaches are relevant and practical locally.
- Community engagement and ownership: involving local stakeholders – including Neighbourhood Houses, local councils and other community organisations and leaders – in designing, implementing and leading localised prevention strategies. This will ensure that solutions are culturally appropriate and grounded in the lived experiences of the community.
- Systemic and multi-level interventions: addressing child sexual abuse across individual, relational, institutional, and societal levels within a specific place. Situating responses to child sexual abuse within a context of other harms and risks will strengthen protective factors, community cohesion, accessible reporting mechanisms and robust institutional safeguards.
"It reminds me of that Einstein quote: ‘If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.’ It's time for our government to break away from the status quo. Doing things differently isn't just a suggestion; it's a necessity if we want to see real change and protect our children effectively."
— specialist sexual violence practitioner, Laurel House consultation participant[25]
Responding to risk factors and drivers
The Government Response commits to the significant task of responding to deep failures of our government systems and institutions to protect children and young people from child sexual abuse and respond effectively when risks and allegations are brought to light. The Government Response outlines the substantial program of work and investment to deliver these commitments by transforming our government institutions, our systems, our culture and rebuilding trust.
However, prevention is only effective if we can recognise the warning signs of abuse and know how to respond to complaints and concerns about it. This requires changes to laws and policies, community and institutional cultures, and individual beliefs, attitudes and practices.
Evidence also shows that statutory responses to child sexual abuse focus on only one dimension of the issue and are often unable to prevent future harm.[26]
A holistic approach to the prevention of child sexual abuse integrates primary prevention, early intervention, response and recovery and healing. Due to the hidden nature of child sexual abuse, prevention efforts must also focus on raising whole of community awareness. Whilst focused on holding perpetrators to account, lack of community awareness and ignorance about the nature and prevalence of child sexual abuse leaves children vulnerable and can allow abuse to persist.[27]
The Iceberg Model for this strategy (Figure 4) has been co-designed with victim-survivors, community sector and government representatives to identify underlying causes and systemic structures that perpetuate child sexual abuse. By identifying all layers—from immediate responses to deeply held beliefs—this strategy aims to take a robust, holistic, and sustainable approach to addressing child sexual abuse in our community, including institutions.
By using a multifaceted approach to address the complex nature of child sexual abuse, as outlined in Figure 2, this strategy aims to provide the framework for systemic change. This includes focusing on the structural changes required and the beliefs and values that influence behaviours, decisions and actions.

Figure 4: the Iceberg Model
Our Theory of Change
This strategy’s Theory of Change was developed using a systems thinking approach at the consultation and co-design workshop in November 2024, to identify how and why we expect change to occur as we work to achieve our vision. It provides a clear framework to understand how specific actions can lead to desired long-term outcomes. It ensures a more effective, evidence-based approach to tackling the complex nature of child sexual abuse. Our Theory of Change will underpin the forthcoming Change for Children action plans.
A summary version has been developed below, including the long-term outcomes we are working towards to achieve our vision and some of the key medium-term outcomes identified that will help us get there (Table 2). Our comprehensive Theory of Change is available on the Keeping Children Safe website.

Table 2: Summarised Theory of Change
How we will work together
“…If I tell an adult about something that I am worried about, they should listen to me, and believe me, and do something about it...”
— Participant, Commissioner for Children and Young People Tasmania, ‘Start the Conversation’[28]
Children and young people and victim-survivors are at the heart of this strategy to ensure that the principles of safety, dignity, and recovery guide every aspect of prevention, intervention, and response. We acknowledge that children and young people and victim-survivors are not just passive recipients of support but active contributors whose voices and experiences must shape the responses they receive.
Acknowledging the unique strengths, barriers and potential vulnerabilities of each child and young person and victim-survivor is a key part of this strategy. It emphasises responses that consider their age, developmental stage, cultural background, identity and individual circumstances. We recognise that all children and young people and victim-survivors have a right to feel and be safe.
By focusing on the perspectives of children and young people and victim-survivors, this strategy also promotes collaboration among caregivers, professionals, and communities to build a holistic, empathetic, and effective responses to child sexual abuse. It ensures that solutions are informed by professional expertise and understanding of the lived experiences of children and young people and victim-survivors, fostering trust and resilience.
Children and young people
To inform this strategy's development, the Commissioner for Children and Young People established The Voices for Tasmanian Youth. This group of 19 young people aged 10‑18 represents diverse communities, identities, and experiences across Tasmania. The Voices for Tasmanian Youth have shared their views on what they expect from this strategy and associated action plans.
Through conversations and brainstorming sessions, The Voices for Tasmanian Youth shared their concerns and discussed their visions for change (Our Vision for a Safer Tomorrow).
We commit to making the necessary changes to work towards their vision for a safer tomorrow through implementing Change for Children.
The Voices for Tasmanian Youth – Our Vision for a Safer Tomorrow
"We want a Tasmania where every child and young person feels safe, supported, and empowered to speak out."
"We want a future where adults genuinely listen, understand our experiences, and respond effectively. Where they build trust and open communication on topics like sex, consent and abuse."
"We want sex education that reflects our real lives and diverse experiences, promoting emotional, mental, and physical safety."
"We want a future where young voices have an equal say in decision-making, shaping safe environments in our institutions and communities."
"We want institutions that are safe spaces, where everyone feels welcome, respected, and supported. We need to trust the institutions that serve us, so that we feel confident attending school, accessing healthcare, and seeking help."
"We want reporting systems that are safe and easy to use. Where we know where to get support and who to report concerns to. Where complaints are handled independently and effectively."
"We want a future where cycles of violence are broken, and every young person is empowered to thrive through a focus on prevention, rehabilitation, and supportive networks."
"We want a safer tomorrow for all children and young people."
The United Nations Convention provides further foundational guidance on how we centre children and young people in implementing this strategy.
Article 12 asserts that children have the right to express their views freely in matters affecting them, emphasising:
- Participation – children should be involved in decision-making processes that impact their lives.
- Representation – mechanisms must be in place to ensure that their voices are heard meaningfully.
Article 13 ensures children have the right to seek, receive, and impart information through any medium they choose. This right underpins their ability to participate actively, communicate their perspectives, and contribute to decisions.
This strategy and the associated action plans will ensure that children and young people are engaged in the successful implementation through:
- Space: creating safe and inclusive environments where children feel empowered to express themselves.
- Voice: ensuring children can freely articulate their thoughts without fear of reprisal.
- Audience: identifying the appropriate decision-makers who are responsible for listening to children.
- Influence: guaranteeing that children’s views are acted upon and reflected in outcomes where appropriate.[29]
Engaging with children and young people in new and genuine ways is essential to ensure their participation in implementing this strategy is not merely symbolic but meaningful. The implementation of Change for Children and associated action plans will continue to be informed and guided by the voices of Tasmanian children and young people. Overall implementation of Change for Children will be informed by varied engagement with children and young people, including, where possible, with the Premier’s Youth Advisory Council, The Voices for Tasmanian Youth and the Laurel House Lived Experience Advisory Panel for Young People.
Victim-survivors
“Listen to us… our input is healing for some people.”
— Victim-survivor, Laurel House consultation session participant[30]
Victim-survivors are the experts of their own experiences and play a vital role in shaping policies and interventions that are trauma-informed and effective. Their lived experiences provide critical insights into the realities of abuse, the barriers to reporting, and the gaps in support systems. Involving victim-survivors in consultation and decision-making ensures that prevention, intervention, response and recovery efforts are aligned with real needs. This also breaks the silence around abuse and rebuilds trust in the systems designed to protect and support victim-survivors.
Effective and ongoing consultation and engagement with victim-survivors is crucial for the implementation of Change for Children. In late 2024, the child sexual abuse Victim‑Survivor Advisory Group (the Advisory Group) was established by the Premier.
The Advisory Group will provide a mechanism for representing the views of victim‑survivors to the Tasmanian Government to inform and shape the implementation of the Commission of Inquiry recommendations, including the development and implementation of this strategy and associated action plans.
The Tasmanian Government recognises that engagement with victim-survivors through advisory groups and other similar mechanisms is not the only way we should be working with victim-survivors. We are committed to exploring new ways of working in partnership with victim-survivors to ensure that they have a range of input mechanisms that suit a diverse range of engagement needs.
Working in partnership with Tasmanian Aboriginal people
“Culture is the way to come out of it. That’s what makes me feel safe. I believe that culture is the answer.”
— Consultation with Aboriginal community members, Commission of Inquiry report[31]
We recognise the disproportionate impacts of child sexual abuse on Aboriginal children and young people and their families, particularly due to the enduring impacts of colonisation, child removal, and the ongoing effects of these traumas.
The Commission of Inquiry focused significantly on the urgent need for reform in the ways that the Tasmanian Government works with Aboriginal people to build genuine partnerships and deliver recommendations focused on safeguarding Aboriginal children and young people. These include:
- appointment of a Commissioner for Aboriginal Children and Young People.
- development of an Aboriginal Youth Justice Strategy in partnership with Aboriginal organisations and people.
- full implementation of all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Placement Principle elements.
In delivering these recommendations, we remain committed to the National Agreement on Closing the Gap Priority Reforms through changing practices at a system level to build partnerships and share decision-making with Aboriginal organisations and people.
We acknowledge and are aware of how our cultural values, knowledge, skills and attitudes are formed and affect others, including a responsibility to address unconscious bias, racism and discrimination.
We commit to building Aboriginal cultural safety, including reviewing and adapting organisations and systems to remove barriers to achieve health, wellbeing and safety outcomes for Aboriginal people.
Implementation of this strategy will be informed by kani paliti (Talk with good spirit), our commitment to Tasmanian Aboriginal people.
kani paliti (Talk with good spirit)
The Tasmanian Government will talk with Tasmanian Aboriginal people with good spirit to achieve our commitment statement. We commit to understanding, involving and empowering Tasmanian Aboriginal people.
We will:
- understand and build culturally proficient and responsive care systems that allow truth-telling to be embraced and accepted.
- involve and value Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander expertise and collaborate with Tasmanian Aboriginal people to create culturally appropriate governance models.
- empower children to keep them with Tasmanian Aboriginal people so they can achieve their rights to grow strong on country and in culture and thrive within their cultural and care networks.
We commit to continue talks with Tasmanian Aboriginal people in good spirit as we work in partnership to achieve this statement.
Working with diverse communities
“You can't speak for/protect people if you have no understanding of their experiences in great depth and detail.”
— Victim-survivor, Laurel House consultation survey participant[32]
Child sexual abuse impacts children and young people across all areas of the community and impacts individuals and families from varying socio-economic, cultural, and geographical groups. Recognising that some children and young people may face additional barriers or risks than others is essential.
Different aspects of a child or young person’s identity, including their race, ethnicity, gender, family’s income level, and ability, may impact their risk of child sexual abuse. Children from marginalised groups may be at greater risk of experiencing child sexual abuse due to societal inequalities and lack of support. Perpetrators may also seek out children and young people who they perceive to be more vulnerable.
To effectively prevent, identify and respond to child sexual abuse in Tasmania, all aspects of children and young people’s identities must be understood and respected. Understanding any additional considerations for some children and young people will enable stronger and more inclusive approaches to addressing child sexual abuse.
The following section details particular groups who can experience a higher risk of child sexual abuse and/or additional barriers to disclosure and receiving support.
- Aboriginal children and young people are significantly over-represented in child protection systems and up to 8 times as likely as non-Aboriginal children to be the subject of substantiated child abuse or neglect, including sexual abuse.[33]
- Children and young people with disability face higher rates of sexual abuse and are often targeted due to their perceived vulnerability and dependence on caregivers.[34]
- Children with mental ill health may be at increased risk due to factors such as impaired judgement, difficulties in recognising or communicating unsafe situations and social isolation.[35]
- Gender or sexually diverse children and young people are more likely to experience all types of child maltreatment.[36] More than half (52 per cent) of all LGBTIQA+ children and young people experience child sexual abuse.[37]
- Children and young people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds may face increased vulnerabilities. For example, differing views on what constitutes child abuse and neglect, fears related to visa status, and patriarchal cultures that value men's views over those of women and children can affect the disclosure of, and responses to, child sexual abuse.[38]
- Children and young people from regional and remote areas face additional barriers due to geographical isolation and access to services, as well as reluctance to speak out due to tight-knit communities and close connections.[39]
- Children and young people in closed institutions are at heightened risk of sexual abuse due to factors including isolation from the outside world, power imbalances and limited oversight.[40]
In early 2024, workshops were run to identify considerations for specific diverse communities. These workshops demonstrated that children and young people do not fit into discrete boxes, and as such, this strategy acknowledges the intersectionality of diverse communities. There are three primary considerations that all adults should ask themselves when preventing, identifying, and responding to child sexual abuse. These considerations are informed by kani paliti.
- Understand: take the time to listen actively, ask questions, and recognise individual contexts and needs.
- Involve: individuals and families in decisions that impact them and collaborate safely and effectively to ensure that children and young people and their families can contribute.
- Empower: create safety and support children and young people and their families to actively engage.
Throughout the implementation of this strategy, the Tasmanian Government commits to understanding individual needs, particularly for diverse communities, to ensure that initiatives and reforms are effective. We are committed to engaging with diverse communities to ensure that the delivery of Change for Children meets the needs of all people in Tasmania. To achieve this, we will use existing advisory group mechanisms across agencies, and look at new ways of working with diverse communities on policies and programs that will impact them.

Figure 5 : Intersectionality of diverse communities
Who is accountable for making change?
“Accountability requires actions not words, start from the top.”
— Victim-survivor, Laurel House consultation survey participant[41]
The Tasmanian Government has made a significant commitment to ensure that the findings and recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry and related inquiries are translated into meaningful actions by Tasmanian Government agencies. All Tasmanians, and most importantly, victim-survivors of child sexual abuse, are entitled to know clearly who is formally responsible for making the changes this strategy outlines.
Reform implementation will be overseen by the Keeping Children Safe Governance Structure which is detailed below:

Figure 6: Keeping Children Safe Governance Structure
In line with the Commission of Inquiry’s recommendation (22.1), the Government has appointed an independent Child Safety Reform Implementation Monitor to oversee the reform program. To ensure accountability and transparency, the Monitor will report to Parliament on implementing the recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry and any recommendations of other institutional inquiries, including the Royal Commission and other related State Service reviews (see Appendix 3).
Formal accountabilities
Some entities and individuals hold formal responsibilities outlined in legislation, professional conduct policies and other guidelines. These are detailed in Table 3.
Table 3: Entities and individuals with formal accountabilities
Entity | Description |
---|---|
The Tasmanian Government | The Tasmanian Government and future governments are accountable to the people of Tasmania through the Parliament of Tasmania. |
Parliament of Tasmania | Provides oversight, accountability and a check on the work of the Tasmanian Government through Parliamentary processes and dedicated committees. |
Child Safety Reform Implementation Monitor | Independently holds the power to publicly report on reform progress to the Parliament of Tasmania. |
New Commission for Children and Young People | Advocates for children's rights, monitors child safety, and includes key roles like the Child Advocate. |
Independent Regulator | The Independent Regulator oversees organisations’ compliance with the Child and Youth Safe Organisations Act 2023. This includes State Service agencies and non-government organisations that provide services to children. |
Tasmanian Government Accountable Officers | The Premier, Ministers, and Secretaries are responsible for implementing reforms and reporting progress. |
Tasmanian Government Agencies | Responsible for implementing reforms for approval by the Premier, Ministers and Secretaries. |
Child safe organisations
“Victim-survivors need a safe person to go to, particularly if the young person is currently experiencing the abuse and the home is where the abuse is occurring. Abuse thrives in silos – even family silos. To break this circuit society needs to create opportunities for young people to engage with safe people outside of the home…”
— Consultation participant, Sexual Assault Support Service consultation[42]
In direct response to the 2017 Royal Commission, the governments of Australia developed the National Principles for Child Safe Organisations (National Principles).[43]
These National Principles are now enshrined in legislation as Tasmania’s Child and Youth Safe Standards (the Standards).[44] The Standards are supported by the Universal Principle for Aboriginal Cultural Safety.
All organisations engaging in child-related activities should voluntarily comply with the National Principles (as reflected in the Standards) to the greatest extent possible, regardless of whether they are legislatively bound to do so or when their legislative obligations commence.
The Office of the Independent Regulator ensures implementation and oversight of the Standards through legal obligations under the Child and Youth Safe Organisations Act 2023. Tasmania’s Child and Youth Safe Organisations Framework plays a key role in Tasmania’s child safety system by ensuring that specific organisations are monitored and held accountable for keeping children safe.
Implementation of the Standards by agencies and organisations, including religious organisations, and oversight of this implementation by the Independent Regulator is another way that entities will be held accountable for keeping children safe.
The Standards give effect to the rights of children by translating them into organisational standards and practice. This is shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Child and Youth Safe Organisations Framework alignment with United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
Principles for Child Safe Organisations | United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Alignment |
---|---|
Universal principle: Organisations must provide an environment that ensures that the right to Cultural Safety of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander children is respected. | Article 2 (Non-discrimination) and Article 30 (Minority culture, language and religion). |
1. Child safety and wellbeing is embedded in organisational leadership, governance and culture. | Article 3 (Best interests of the child). |
2. Children and young people are informed about their rights, participate in decisions affecting them and are taken seriously. | Article 12 (Right to be heard) and Article 13 (Freedom of expression). |
3. Families, carers and communities are informed and involved in promoting child safety and wellbeing. | Article 5 (Parental guidance and evolving capacities) and Article 18 (Parental responsibilities and state support). |
4. Equity is upheld and diverse needs respected in policy and practice. | Article 2 (Non-discrimination) and Article 23 (Rights of children with disabilities). |
5. People working with children and young people are suitable and supported to reflect child safety and wellbeing values in practice. | Article 19 (Protection from violence, abuse, and neglect). |
6. Processes to respond to complaints and concerns are child focused. | Article 12 (Right to express views) and Article 19 (Protection from abuse). |
7. Staff and volunteers are equipped with the knowledge, skills and awareness to keep children and young people safe through ongoing education and training. | Article 3 (Best interests of the child). |
8. Physical and online environments promote safety and wellbeing while minimising the opportunity for children and young people to be harmed. | Article 16 (Right to privacy) and Article 31 (Right to leisure and play). |
9. Implementation of the Child and Youth Safe Standards is regularly reviewed and improved. | Article 4 (Implementation of rights). |
10. Policies and procedures document how the organisation is safe for children and young people. | Article 3 (Best interests of the child). |
Information, sharing and feedback
Beyond formal accountabilities, this strategy recognises that particular groups of people also have a role in overseeing reform. Change for Children recognises that it is every adult’s responsibility to keep children and young people safe. Preventing, identifying and responding to child sexual abuse is a collective responsibility that involves all Tasmanians.
This means that at an individual level, within our social circles and family units, within and across our communities, organisations and institutions, and our society at large, we all have a role to play. The Tasmanian Government remains committed to being accountable to all Tasmanians, and in particular to victim-survivors of child sexual abuse. Ongoing critical engagement with specialist services will ensure that the diversity of victim-survivor voices are listened to, heard and supported as Change for Children and associated action plans are implemented.
Further, the Tasmanian Government recognises the essential role of community organisations that deliver health, mental health, housing, disability and other critical services. Community organisations have an essential role in not only providing services, but challenging and changing cultural attitudes and beliefs that discriminate against some members of the community.
Table 5: People and groups to whom the Government is committed to listening to, sharing information with and receiving feedback from
Group | Description |
---|---|
Tasmanian children and young people | Engage with The Voices for Tasmanian Youth and the Laurel House Lived Experience Advisory Panel for Young People to inform the implementation of activities. |
Victim-survivors | The Victim-Survivor Advisory Group will provide direct feedback to leaders, ensuring victim-survivors voices shape reforms. |
Mainstream, community and specialist services | The workforce that partners with government to deliver services, support victim-survivors, and promote child safety and equality. |
Local government | Local government is the statewide community level of government uniquely placed to implement statewide programs interpreted locally, and to make connections across government agencies and other organisations. |
Wider Tasmanian community | Regularly communicate with the community through the Keeping Children Safe website and engage with the community through public awareness raising activities and other engagement work. |
How will we know that we are having an impact?
Change for Children lays out a plan to achieve different types of change over a sustained period. This change can and will be measured in various ways, and by other entities in the system.
The ongoing monitoring and accountability under this strategy will be outlined under the Change for Children associated action plans including an Outcome and Evaluation Framework that will be released in 2025. This framework will be designed to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the Theory of Change and include the commissioning of an independent evaluation in 2029 and 2034 on the implementation of the strategy’s long-term outcomes. The Framework will also provide assurances to the Tasmanian people that the system is working well and has children and young people and victim-survivors at its core.
Several other mechanisms that have been built into the Tasmanian Government’s response to the Commission of Inquiry that will contribute to the monitoring and evaluation of this strategy and associated action plans. These are:
- Quarterly reporting on the Recommendation Status of the Commission of Inquiry recommendations will be published on the Keeping Children Safe website.
- The Child Safety Reform Implementation Monitor independently holds the government accountable for reform progress, which includes:
- developing an Evaluation Framework and undertaking analysis and public reports on whether outcomes are being realised and how reforms are being implemented for both the Commission of Inquiry and Royal Commission findings and recommendations.
- provide periodic reports every five years to monitor and mitigate unintended consequences of reforms and support continuous improvement.
- The Independent Regulator oversees Tasmania’s compliance with the Child and YouthSafe Organisations Framework.
In addition to these mechanisms:
- the action plans will have performance measures that will be reported annually and align where possible with the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework – National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2021–2030.
- the Department of Premier and Cabinet will commission the periodic over-sampling of Tasmanian data of the National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse’s Australian child sexual abuse attitudes, knowledge and response study to measure any community‑wide changes.
Appendix 1: Seeking support and advice
Child sexual abuse is a crime.
If you have any concerns for the wellbeing and safety of yourself or any other person, including those who may have experienced or are at risk of experiencing child sexual abuse, please seek help.
In an emergency, call 000 for urgent police or medical assistance.
An alphabetical list of relevant, freely available services is provided below.
You may also wish to seek help from your GP, another professional or a counsellor.
Services available 24 hours a day
- 1800 MYSUPPORT (24/7) 1800 697 877 State-wide Sexual Assault Support Line run by Laurel House in the North and North West and the Sexual Assault Support Service in the South.
- 13 YARN (24/7) 139 276 or 13yarn.org.au
- 1800 RESPECT (24/7) 1800 737 732 or 1800respect.org.au
- Beyond Blue (24/7) 1300 224 636 or beyondblue.org.au
- headspace 1800 650 890 or headspace.org.au
- KidsHelpline (24/7) 1800 55 1800 or kidshelpline.com.au
- Lifeline (24/7) 131 114 or lifelinetasmania.org.au
- MensLine Australia (24/7) 1300 789 978 or mensline.org.au
- Strong Families, Safe Kids (24/7) 1800 000 123 or strongfamiliessafekids.tas.gov.au
- Suicide Call Back Service (24/7) 1300 659 467 or suicidecallbackservice.org.au
- Tasmania Police (non-emergency 24/7 assistance line) 131 444 or police.tas.gov.au
- Tell Someone (for children and adults, links to 24/7 services) tellsomeone.tas.gov.au
Services that may not be contactable by phone or email outside business hours
- Autism Connect 1300 308 699 or amaze.org.au/autismconnect
- Blue Knot Foundation 1300 657 380 or blueknot.org.au
- Bravehearts 1800 272 831 or bravehearts.org.au
- Laurel House 6334 2740 (North) or 6431 9711 (North-West) or laurelhouse.org.au
- National Redress Scheme 1800 737 377 or nationalredress.gov.au
- Relationships Australia Tasmania 1300 364 277 or tas.relationships.org.au
- Survivors & Mates Support Network 1800 472 676 or samsn.org.au
- Sexual Assault Support Service 6231 0044 or sass.org.au
- Victims of Crime 1300 300 238 or justice.tas.gov.au/victims/services/victims-of-crime-service
- Working it Out 6231 1200 or workingitout.org.au
Appendix 2: Meanings matter
Where possible this strategy adopts the most recent terminology used by the National Office for Child Safety and is aligned with the National Strategy to assist in monitoring and evaluation.
Term | Meaning |
---|---|
Child abuse | the maltreatment of a child that includes neglect, physical abuse, emotional and psychological abuse, sexual abuse and exposure to or involvement in domestic or family violence. The abuser may be an adult or another child, direct or indirect, in-person or online. |
Child-centred approach | prioritises the needs, rights, and wellbeing of the child. It ensures the child’s voice is heard and respected, while fostering safe environments and offering tailored support to address their specific needs. This approach also involves children in decision-making processes where appropriate, empowering them in their journey toward healing and recovery. It emphasises creating child-friendly environments that encourage engaging children in ways that are age-appropriate, developmentally suitable, and considerate of factors affecting their decision-making abilities. It also seeks to strengthen protective factors and address risks by building on the strengths of both the child and their caregivers.[45] |
Child exploitation material |
material that describes or depicts, in a way that a reasonable person would regard as being, in all circumstances, offensive, a person who is or who appears to be under the age of 18 years – engaged in sexual activity; or in a sexual context; or as the subject of torture, cruelty or abuse (whether or not in a sexual context).[46] |
Child protection system | ‘child protection’ refers to preventing and responding to violence, exploitation, abuse, neglect, and harmful practices against children. When children cannot live safely at home, child protection systems prioritise children’s physical, mental and psychosocial needs to safeguard their lives and futures. Child protection functions to protect the fundamental rights of children which include safety, freedom from violence and a stable family environment.[47] |
Child safe organisation | an organisation that consciously and systematically: creates an environment in which children’s rights, safety and wellbeing are at the centre of thought, values and actions; engages with children and young people to create conditions that reduce the likelihood of harm; creates conditions that increase the likelihood of identifying potential harm; and responds to concerns, suspicions, allegations and disclosures of abuse. |
Child safety system | the set of laws, policies, practices and services both within and outside of government, put in place to protect children and young people from harm or abuse. |
Child sexual abuse[48] |
any act that exposes a child or young person to, or involves a child or young person in, sexual activities that: they do not understand they do not or cannot consent to are not accepted by the community or are unlawful. |
Children and young people[49] | people under the age of 18. |
Children and young people who have displayed harmful sexual behaviours[50] | children and young people who have displayed sexual behaviours that fall outside what may be considered developmentally typical or socially appropriate, and/or cause harm to themselves or others. When these behaviours involve others, they may include a lack of consent, reciprocity, mutuality, and may involve the use of coercion, shame, force, or a misuse of power. Harmful sexual behaviours evoke concerns about the development and wellbeing of the child, young person, or others involved, and where they involve other children or young people, the behaviours may cause significant harm and may be experienced as abusive by other children and young people involved. Harmful sexual behaviours may include illegal behaviours that require a criminal justice response. Harmful sexual behaviours can occur in any setting, including in person and online. |
Closed institutions | The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Australia defines "closed institutions" as settings where children are confined or have limited freedom of movement and are isolated from the broader community[51]. These environments typically have strict, tightly controlled daily schedules and are characterised by secrecy and restricted information flow. They can include detention centres, boarding schools and mental health facilities. Daily life in a closed institution is markedly different from living in the community, where people live, work and socialise in different places, and with different people.[52] |
Commission of Inquiry | Commission of Inquiry into the Tasmanian Government’s Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Institutional Settings |
Cultural safety[53] | Cultural safety refers to an environment ‘where there is no assault, challenge or denial of [a person’s] identity, of who they are and what they need’.[54] It refers specifically to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. This includes Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ own assessment of their safety and capacity to engage meaningfully and on their own terms with a non Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander person or organisation. This requires a non Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander person or organisation to listen, enable and support these environments, with accountability to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander colleagues or service users. [55] |
Culturally and linguistically diverse communities[56] | Australia’s population includes many people who were born overseas or speak a variety of languages. Together, these groups of people are known as culturally and linguistically diverse populations or communities. However, some commentors view the term as increasingly problematic; for example, the Diversity Council of Australia suggests the term prioritises cultural and linguistic explanations of difference and is therefore insufficient for any meaningful discussion or understanding of race and racism. [57][58] |
Empowerment | the process of gaining freedom and power to do what you want or to control what happens to you. [59] |
Grooming[60] |
behaviours that manipulate and control a child, their family, kin and carers or other support networks, or organisations. The intent of manipulation to: • gain access to the child • obtain the child’s compliance • maintain the child’s silence • avoid discovery of sexual abuse. Grooming can be done by people already well known to the child, including by a child’s family member, kin or carer. Grooming can take place in person and online and is often difficult to identify. Behaviours related to grooming are not necessarily explicitly sexual, directly abusive or criminal. They may only be recognised in hindsight. Some grooming behaviours are consistent with behaviours or activities in non‑abusive relationships. In these cases, the main difference between acceptable behaviours and grooming behaviours is the motivation behind them. Online child grooming refers to the process of establishing and building a relationship with a child through the use of the internet or other technologies to facilitate sexual contact with that child, either physically or online. Online grooming may include perpetrators encouraging victims to engage in sexual activity or to send the perpetrator sexually explicit material. It may lead to perpetrators meeting the victim in person or blackmailing the victim to self‑produce explicit materials. To evade detection in the grooming phase, perpetrators may also convince the victim to migrate to and from multiple online platforms, including those using encrypted technologies |
Incidence[61] | the number of new cases of child sexual abuse each year. |
Institutional betrayal | wrongdoings perpetrated by an institution upon individual’s dependent on that institution, including failure to prevent or respond supportively to wrongdoings by individuals committed within the context of the institution.[62] When institutions cover up sexual violence, institutional betrayal undermines recovery. Institutional betrayal can occur in relation to isolated incidents, or systemic issues; it can include betrayal by omission, and betrayal by commission.[63] |
Institutional child sexual abuse | abuse that occurs within, is enabled by or attributable to the premises, action, inaction, activities or operations of a government or non-government organisation and/or its employees/volunteers in the course of, or in connection with, their duties or on the premises by a third party (for instance another child). This may include child sexual abuse that has occurred on an organisation’s premises or at other locations where the operations of the organisation are taking place. |
Intergenerational trauma | intergenerational trauma refers to trauma that is passed from the first generation of survivors who have experienced trauma, down to future children, grandchildren, nieces, and nephews. If the trauma is unresolved, next generations have a higher risk of developing trauma symptoms. An example is where parents have been denied the right to develop safe attachments with their children and provide those children with predictable home environments. In that case, children may be vulnerable to developmental delay, poor education outcomes, interpersonal issues, disability, and higher chances of coming into contact with the criminal justice system. The likelihood of intergenerational trauma is high in families of Stolen Generation children. [64] |
Intra-familial relationships | these comprise a range of familial ties between perpetrators and victims. Depending on the familial context, friends of the family can be considered part of the family. Whether they are blended or biological, familial relationships are often characterised by privacy, complex attachments, frequent and intimate contact, and gender role expectations (e.g., paternal authority). As discussed in the following section, familial environments can contain a range of risk factors—such as family violence, dysfunction and disadvantage—that can increase the risk of child sexual abuse occurring as well, either from a parent or other relative. [65] |
LGBTIQA+ | lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer, asexual and other gender and sexually diverse people. It is important to recognise that this acronym does not cover all forms of sex, gender and sexuality diversity and is not intended to be limiting. The ‘+’ after the acronym is in recognition of this, and points to the fact that there are other terms and language people might want to use to describe these experiences and concepts. |
Mandatory reporter | a person who is required by either state or territory law to report known and suspected cases of child abuse and neglect to a nominated government department or agency. Usually, they need to report to a child protection authority.[66] |
National Strategy | National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2021-2030 |
Offender[67] | a person who is found by a court to have done something unlawful. |
Organisation[68] |
an incorporated or unincorporated group, body, entity or institution. For example, a sports club, school, religious organisation, or government body. We use the term ’organisation’ to describe any entity that provides, or has at any time provided, activities, facilities, programs or services of any kind that facilitates access to children by adults, including through their families. Where information relates to findings of the Royal Commission, we use the term ‘institution’. |
Outcomes[69] |
a desired condition that is specific enough to be measured. They are clear, unambiguous and high level statements that allow measurement of success (for example: children and young people are free from abuse and neglect). Long term outcomes refer to the sustained changes required to reduce the risk, extent and impact of child sexual abuse and related harms in Australia. Medium term or ‘enabling’ outcomes refer to the specific and measurable changes that are expected as a result of activities being implemented. Outcomes will be focused on the impact of activities for children and young people, victims and survivors, families, kin and carers, communities, and organisations and governments (though individual activities may not result in material changes for all of these groups). |
Out-of-home care | the system of formal care provided to children and young people assessed under the Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act 1997 as unable to live safely at home with parents or primary caregivers because of concerns for their safety and wellbeing. |
People with disability | includes, but not restricted to, those who have long-term physical, mental, cognitive, intellectual, or sensory impairments. People with disability have specific needs, priorities and perspectives based on their individual identities including their gender, age, sexuality, race, and cultural background, and can face additional barriers and inequities.[70] |
Perpetrator[71] | an adult who has sexually abused a child or young person, but who may or may not have been convicted of this crime. |
Prevalence[72] | the proportion of people in the population who have experienced child sexual abuse. |
Place-based[73] | place-based approaches are collaborative and long-term and are ideally characterised by partnering and shared design, shared stewardship, and shared accountability for outcomes and impacts. These approaches target the specific circumstances of a place and engage local people as active participants in development and implementation, requiring government to share decision-making. Place-based approaches can complement the bigger picture of services and infrastructure. They engage with issues and opportunities that are driven by complex, intersecting local factors and requiring a cross-sectoral or long-term response. |
Primary prevention[74] | primary prevention responses are aimed at the whole community and address the underlying causes of child sexual abuse. Primary prevention looks at the social conditions that excuse, justify or enable child sexual abuse. Primary prevention measures can include public education, such as awareness-raising campaigns, and programs to create child safe cultures and environments. This may be done through changing or creating new laws. |
Response[75] | any support provided to a service user by an organisation. This includes, but is not limited to, therapeutic/clinical interventions, cultural healing approaches, case management, legal advice/redress support, advocacy, peer support, and referral. |
Royal Commission | Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse |
Safeguard | to protect a person’s health, wellbeing and human rights, enabling them to live free from harm |
Sextortion (sexual extortion) [76] | sexual extortion, also referred to as sextortion, is a form of online blackmail where a perpetrator threatens to share a person’s personal sexual images or videos, unless they give into the perpetrator’s demands. These demands can be for money, more graphic content, or sexual favours in exchange for not sharing the personal sexual images or videos of the person. |
Sexual violence[77] | in the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ 2016 Personal Safety Survey, sexual violence is defined as the occurrence, attempt or threat of sexual assault since the age of 15.[78] However, many researchers and clinicians in the field conceptualise sexual violence more broadly to encompass child sexual assault, sexual harassment, street based sexual harassment and image based abuse. |
Situational crime prevention[79] | focuses on creating organisation-wide responses through policies, practices, and strategies designed to reduce the vulnerability of children and young people while empowering all adults to actively contribute to their protection. |
Staff | a paid worker employed or engaged by an organisation or institution |
Standards | Tasmania’s Child and Youth Safe Standards and Universal Principle to ensure Aboriginal Cultural Safety |
Trauma-informed[80] | approaches ensure practices, policies and culture recognise and respond to the effects of trauma on a person’s wellbeing and behaviour. A trauma-informed approach is distinct from trauma-specific interventions or therapeutic treatments. These interventions are part of, but not the same as, a system-wide trauma-informed approach. A trauma-informed approach does not require a service to provide therapeutic treatment addressing the symptoms of trauma. |
Victim-survivor | refers to someone who has experienced sexual abuse as a child or young person. |
Volunteer[81] | a person who is acting on a voluntary basis (irrespective of whether the person receives out-of-pocket expenses). |
Worker | any person who carries out paid or unpaid work for on behalf of an organisation or institution; includes staff and volunteers as defined above. |
Appendix 3: Policy context
Change for Children acknowledges the ongoing efforts and range of strategies, plans, initiatives and programs aimed at improving children's lives and addressing child sexual abuse through prevention, identification, and response.
Change for Children enhances current efforts and reflects many reviews and reports submitted to the Tasmanian Government over the last 10 years. Related strategies, action plans, frameworks, policies and reports include:
1. Tasmanian Government
1.1 Children and young person specific
- It takes a Tasmanian Village: Tasmania’s Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy
- Youth Justice Blueprint 2024-2034
- Wellbeing for Learning: Child and Student Wellbeing Strategy
- Child and Youth Safe Organisations Framework
- Child Safety and Wellbeing Framework
1.2 Related strategies and policies
- Keeping Children Safe and Rebuilding Trust – Response to the Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Tasmanian Government's Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
- Tasmania’s Third Family and Sexual Violence Action Plan 2022-2027: Survivors at the Centre*
- Equal Means Equal: Tasmanian Women’s Strategy 2022-2027
- Community Services Industry Plan 2021-2031
Forthcoming: Tasmanian Implementation Plan on Closing the Gap 2024-27
Forthcoming: Tasmania’s Disability Strategy
Forthcoming: Tasmanian Government Multicultural Action Plan 2025-2029
2. Australian Government
2.1 Child and young person specific
The National Strategy for Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2021-2030
Safe and Supported: the National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children
Safe and Supported: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander First Action Plan 2023-2026
2.2 Related strategies and policies
National Principles for Child Safe Organisations
National Office for Child Safety Practice guide for workers and organisations
National Agreement on Closing the Gap
The National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children 2022-2032
Australia’s Disability Strategy 2021-31
2023-2030 Australian Cyber Security Strategy
3. Relevant inquiries, reviews, reports and schemes
3.1 Child and young person specific
Take Notice, Believe Us and Act! Report of the Commissioner for Children and Young People
Independent Inquiry into the Department of Education’s Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
Independent Child Safe Governance Review of the Launceston General Hospital and Human Resources
The National Redress Scheme is for people who have experienced institutional child sexual abuse
3.2 Related reviews and reports
The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
The Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability
The Woolcott Review (not finalised)
Review of the Commission of Inquiry Act 1995 (Tasmanian Law Reform Institute)
4. Relevant Tasmanian legislation
Criminal Code Act 1924 (Tas)
Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act 1997 (Tas)
Child and Youth Safe Organisations 2023 (Tas)
Commissioner for Children and Young People Act 2016 (Tas)
Commission for Children and Young People Bill 2024 (Tas)
Youth Justice Act 1997 (Tas)
Appendix 4: Risk factors and drivers
4.1 What are the impacts of child sexual abuse?
“Being abused the way I was is a death sentence. I will die with this. I am still here and still alive but what happened to me does not ever go away. I am capable, competent, intelligent, kind but I was robbed of an innocence and childhood that everyone deserves.”
– Victim-survivor, Laurel House consultation survey participant[82]
The trauma impact of child sexual abuse often goes unrecognised and untreated. As children and young people often do not have the developmental capacity to process such experiences, these traumas can manifest as physical, emotional, or psychological symptoms.
These impacts can be lifelong due to the profound effects they have on development, mental health, and relationships. If left unresolved, trauma can impact across generations and communities, creating a cycle of intergenerational trauma. People who have experienced child sexual abuse are:[83]
- twice as likely to have severe alcohol use disorder
- almost twice as likely to have post-traumatic stress disorder
- around 1.6 times as likely to have generalised anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder or moderate alcohol use disorder
- almost 3 times as likely to report self-harming behaviour
- more than twice as likely to report suicide attempts.
Recovery involves support, connection and access to appropriate services to support healing.
4.2 Underlying risks and drivers of child sexual abuse
"It affects your core beliefs; these normal behaviours, not unusual behaviours to me at all, and I had a real vulnerability afterwards… keeping to yourself makes you more vulnerable; the better you deal with the first instance, it’s protective, as much as it makes you sad and guilty (as a parent you need to) let that go and (tell your child) we will get you back to a point where you know exactly what consent is.”
– Participant, Sexual Assault Support Service consultation[84]
Research and data on child sexual abuse is still emerging due to several challenges, including the sensitive, complex, and often hidden nature of the issue. This section is informed by existing evidence-based research on child sexual abuse and the information is explored further in an accompanying companion document which is available on our website (keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au).
To address these research and data limitations, Australian, state and territory governments are working together with the National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse to develop and implement a strategic research agenda to:
- build our evidence on the risk, extent and impact of child sexual abuse victimisation in Australia
- assess how effective child sexual abuse offender programs are, and
- guide how we develop and improve new policy interventions.
Risk factors for children and young people
To effectively prevent and respond to child sexual abuse, it is necessary to understand the risk factors that increase the likelihood of victimisation and perpetration, as well as drivers that led people to perpetrate abuse.
There are a range of factors that increase a child’s risk of being targeted and harmed.[85] Some of these include:
- being female.
- family and sexual violence in the family, including past or current experiences of maltreatment, such as neglect and/or emotional abuse.
- being part of a socially, economically, racially or culturally marginalised group.
- living in vulnerable circumstances such as homelessness, out-of-home care settings and closed institutions like youth detention facilities.
- diverse gender and sexual identities.
- disability, particularly where there is a need for an adult to assist with personal care or where there are communication diversities.
- poor family cohesion, parental separation and blended families.
- social isolation, poor social skills or being bullied by peers.
Protective factors for children and young people
Certain risk factors can increase children and young people’s vulnerability to sexual abuse, while protective factors can help reduce it. Although protective factors cannot completely shield a child from abuse, they can mitigate risks and provide safeguards.[86] Examples of factors that may decrease the likelihood of a child experiencing sexual abuse include:
- supportive and trustworthy adults.
- supportive peers.
- children and young people’s understanding of appropriate and inappropriate sexual behaviour, including sexual abuse, and personal safety.
- children and young people’s ability to assert themselves verbally or physically to reject the abuse.
- strong community or cultural connections.
- organisations and institutions who adopt policies to prevent and respond to child safety risks.
Who sexually abuses children?
People who sexually abuse children and young people come from all backgrounds. They include parents, family members, family friends, acquaintances, community members, and people who work or volunteer in all types of organisations. There is no typical profile of a person who sexually abuses children and young people. In most cases, there is little to distinguish individuals who commit child sexual abuse from the general population, except for their criminal behaviour.
Research on child sexual abuse indicates that men are more likely than women to commit abuse across various settings, including institutional environments, online, and in family homes.[87] However, it is essential to acknowledge that women can also be perpetrators, and men can be victims. Additionally, data from the Royal Commission revealed that 94 per cent of institutional child sexual abuse cases were perpetrated by adult men.[88]
While child abuse occurs predominantly within families (neglect, emotional and physical abuse), it is important to highlight that child sexual abuse and exploitation occurs across a broader range of settings and relationships. The unique characteristics of child sexual abuse perpetration are shown in Figure 7 by highlighting the diverse range of settings, relationships and contexts in which child sexual abuse occurs.

Figure 7: Conceptual map of settings, relationships and contexts in which child sexual abuse occurs[89]
Common perpetrator risk factors
While there is a diversity of perpetrator types, some of the most frequently observed risk factors associated with perpetrating have been identified as:[90]
- being male.[91]
- exposure to highly sexualised environments.
- a history of childhood abuse and/or neglect.
- involvement in violent or criminal behaviour.
- experience of family violence and instability.
While a number of risk factors are shared with other (non-sexual) criminal offenders, the key point of difference is the sexual drive to offend. This is supported by recent research on the attitudes of child sexual abuse perpetrators, such as their beliefs and attitudes in relation to children and young people as sexual objects, a general preoccupation with sex, and beliefs about entitlement, authority or control.[92]
In recognising this point, the Royal Commission identified three types of perpetrators:[93]
- persistent perpetrators: are typically long-term abusers with a sexual attraction to children or young people. They often target multiple victims, lack age-appropriate relationships, and are more likely to exhibit paedophilic interests. However, this group represents a minority and does not reflect most perpetrators, despite common stereotypes.
- opportunistic perpetrators: are less fixated on abusing children, often engaging in other criminal behaviours. They may not prefer children over adults but exploit opportunities for sexual gratification. Unlike others, they rarely groom or create situations to enable abuse.
- situational perpetrators: typically lack a sexual preference for children, they abuse in response to personal issues like isolation, poor relationships, or low self-esteem.
Children and young people who display harmful sexual behaviours
Some children and young people experience sexual abuse by other children and young people. The term ‘harmful sexual behaviours’ is used to cover a wide range of sexual behaviours that are inappropriate for the child’s age and development.
‘Harmful sexual behaviours’ is used to describe sexual behaviours by a child or young person that causes harm to themselves or others.[94] As sexual development and exploration is a normal part of childhood and growing up, not all sexual behaviours are harmful or concerning. For this reason, sexual behaviours can be understood across a continuum of varying levels, from developmentally appropriate to developmentally inappropriate, to more concerning, serious and/or extreme harmful sexual behaviours.
In recognition of their developing physical, psychological, emotional, and educational needs, children who engage in harmful sexual behaviours are not labelled as perpetrators. The protection of the best interests of the child places greater focus on rehabilitation and restorative justice rather than punitive measures, while also ensuring public safety. Further, most children and young people who receive appropriate treatment, supervision and support will stop displaying harmful sexual behaviours.[95] For these reasons it is important that harmful sexual behaviour is prevented with early intervention so that harm is minimised and children are kept safe from sexual abuse.
There are a number of risk factors for children and young people displaying harmful sexual behaviours. Commonly identified factors include prior trauma, exposure to family violence, prior sexual or physical abuse, exposure to pornography, and intellectual impairment and intellectual difficulties.[96]
Trends show an increase in reports of adolescents who are displaying harmful sexual behaviours against other children and young people.[97] It is likely this has been influenced by several social factors including greater access to online sexually explicit material, including violent content, compared to previous generations.[98] This driver is compounded by forms of masculinity that promote male dominance, entitlement (including sexual entitlement), authority and control.[99]
Children and young people who have displayed or experience harmful sexual behaviours need a supportive, compassionate and understanding response. Both may benefit from a range of trauma-informed services to meet their needs.
Drivers of child sexual abuse
Drivers are the fundamental factors or social conditions that contribute to environments where child sexual abuse can occur.
Much like family and sexual violence, the primary drivers of child sexual abuse are gendered due to perpetrators being overwhelmingly male and victim-survivors being overwhelmingly female. The root cause of sexual violence against women and girls is recognised to be forms of masculinity that promote male dominance, entitlement (including sexual entitlement), authority and control. These attitudes and behaviours are reinforced by male peer relations and cultures of masculinity that emphasise exploitation and entitlement.[100],[101]
Children and young people’s structural vulnerability within families, organisations and institutions can increase their vulnerability to sexual abuse.[102] Beliefs and attitudes that contribute to this include:
- beliefs that adults possess inherent superiority and authority over children and young people.
- attitudes that downplay or disregard children and young people’s perspectives, emotions, and experiences in relationships and events.
- beliefs that children and young people should not question or challenge adults, viewing such behaviour as intentionally defiant or provocative.
These attitudes can lead to problematic assumptions that adults’ behaviour and interaction with children and young people is appropriate or in the child’s best interest. This allows adult perpetrators to manipulate a range of situations and groom children.
Table 6 provides an overview of the risk factors and drivers, which are available in more detail in the corresponding companion document Understanding Child Sexual Abuse on the Keeping Children Safe website.

Table 6: Risk factors and drivers of child sexual abuse[103]
4.3 The intersection of child sexual abuse and family and sexual violence
“…more of an emphasis on shifting patriarchal/sexist attitudes that lead to gendered violence. This could happen through more campaigns in the media, talks in schools, etc. Information packages for parents could be good too to try and instil these values, so that instead of only teaching their daughters to say 'no' and to be safe at night, they have conversations with their sons about affirmative consent and respecting women.”
– Survey respondent, Sexual Assault Support Service consultation survey[104]
Child sexual abuse and family and sexual violence are deeply intertwined, sharing a number of similar characteristics, impacts, risk factors and drivers. However, despite these similarities the dynamics of child sexual abuse are different from family and sexual violence because child sexual abuse and exploitation occurs within a wider range of circumstances, relationships and settings where children’s structural vulnerability relative to adults can be exploited by perpetrators. These factors highlight the importance of adopting a tailored approach to the prevention and response to child sexual abuse.
This strategy complements the work already underway to prevent and respond to family and sexual violence in Tasmania through Survivors at the Centre: Tasmania’s Third Family and Sexual Violence Action Plan 2022-2027.
Gendered nature of sexual abuse
Women are much more likely to have been victims of child sexual abuse than men, with girls in contemporary Australia 2.5 times more likely to experience child sexual abuse.[105] Evidence also clearly shows that men are overwhelmingly the main perpetrators of child sexual abuse and family and sexual violence.[106] Of the victim-survivors who told the Royal Commission about sexual abuse by an adult, almost all (94 per cent) said they were abused by a man.[107] Like child sexual abuse, women are overwhelmingly the victims of family and sexual violence.
Co-occurrence of child sexual abuse and family and sexual violence
Child sexual abuse and family and sexual violence often occur within the same family environment, with perpetrators being family members or intimate partners. As with family and sexual violence, child sexual abuse also occurs within controlling relationships, characterised by patterns of coercion and manipulation.
The co-occurrence of child sexual abuse and family and sexual violence refers to the situation where both forms of abuse happen within the same family by the same person. Emerging research from the University of New South Wales on the prevalence rates of child sexual abuse and family and sexual violence victimisation have found co-occurrence rates ranging from 23 per cent to 91 per cent.[108]
The intersection of family violence, sexual violence, and child sexual abuse often leads to intergenerational cycles of trauma. This cycle comes from the interplay of emotional, behavioural, and systemic factors that perpetuate harm across generations.
Evidence also shows that people who experience sexual abuse in childhood are more likely to report family violence as adults. This poses challenges in responding effectively to the intersections of family and sexual violence and familial child sexual abuse. Women and children in these situations may feel trapped or powerless to speak out, especially if they are dependent on the abuser for care, shelter or emotional support. The fear of further violence can prevent children and adults from disclosing either form of abuse.
Exposure to family and sexual violence has been identified as a common risk factor for children to engage in harmful sexual behaviours. Witnessing violence or being directly involved in abusive situations can lead to children mimicking or engaging in harmful sexual behaviours as a way of coping or exerting control.[109]
Endnotes
[1] Commission of Inquiry into the Tasmanian Government’s Responses to Child Sexual Abuse Report (2023). Retrieved from: commissionofinquiry.tas.gov.au/report
[2] Laurel House (2024). Consultation report to inform development of Tasmania’s Child Sexual Abuse Reform Strategy, prepared by Moodie T and Smith E, page 107. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[3] Laurel House (2024). Consultation report to inform development of Tasmania’s Child Sexual Abuse Reform Strategy, prepared by Moodie T and Smith E, page 41-42. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[4] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Sexual Assault Support Service (2024). What Matters Most – Child Sexual Abuse Reform 2024, prepared by MacSween M., approved by Doherty, S. p. 28. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[9] Tasmanian Government (2024) 2024-25 Tasmanian Budget. Retrieved from: treasury.tas.gov.au/budget-and-financial-management/2024-25-tasmanian-budget
[10] Wise, S. (2017). Developments to strengthen systems for child protection across Australia, CFCA Paper No. 44. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/resources/policy-and-practice-papers/developments-strengthen-systems-child-protection-across
[11] Laurel House (2024). Consultation report to inform development of Tasmania’s Child Sexual Abuse Reform Strategy, prepared by Moodie T and Smith E, page 76. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[12] Sexual Assault Support Service (2024). What Matters Most – Child Sexual Abuse Reform 2024, prepared by MacSween M., approved by Doherty, S. Page 20. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[13] Commissioner for Children and Young People (Tas) 2024. A decade of children’s voices on child safety. Page 7. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[14] Tomison, Adam (2001), A history of child protection: back to the future, Family Matters No. 60, Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/family-matters/no-60/history-child-protection; and Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017), Final Report, Volume 2 – Nature and causes. Retrieved from: childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/final-report
[15] Commissioner for Children and Young People (Tas) 2024. A decade of children’s voices on child safety. Page 6. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[16] Australian Child Maltreatment Study (2023). Retrieved from: acms.au/resources/the-prevalence-and-impact-of-child-maltreatment-in-australia-findings-from-the-australian-child-maltreatment-study-2023-brief-report/
[17] Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Recorded Crime - Victims. ABS. Retrieved from: www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/recorded-crime-victims/latest-release
[18] Australian Government (2021). National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2021-2030. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-prevent-and-respond-child-sexual-abuse-2021-2030
[19] eSafety Commissioner (2024). Child sexual abuse online. Accessed May 2024 from: esafety.gov.au/key-topics/illegal-restricted-content/child-sexual-abuse-online
[20] Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (2024). Research and Statistics. Retrieved from: accce.gov.au/resources/research-and-statistics
[21] National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse (2024). The Australian child sexual abuse attitudes, knowledge and response study: Focus on Tasmania – October 2024. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[22] Sexual Assault Support Service (2024). What Matters Most – Child Sexual Abuse Reform 2024, prepared by MacSween M., approved by Doherty, S. Page 18. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[23] Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse, pp. vii-ix. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse
[24] Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse, pp. 53-66. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse
[25] Laurel House (2024). Consultation report to inform development of Tasmania’s Child Sexual Abuse Reform Strategy, prepared by Moodie T and Smith E, page 79. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[26] Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse. Pp. vi, 45-57. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse
[27] Smallbone, S., Marshall, W. L., & Wortley, R. (2008). Preventing Child Sexual Abuse: Evidence, policy and practice. Wilan Publishing.
[28] Commissioner for Children and Young People (Tas) 2024. A decade of children’s voices on child safety. Page 10. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[29] Laura Lundy model - Ranta, M. (2023). ‘Can we see our voices?’ Young children’s own contributions to authentic child participation as a pillar for sustainability under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 31(6), 914–931. Retrieved from: doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2023.2214716
[30] Ibid.
[31] Commission of Inquiry into the Tasmanian Government’s Responses to Child Sexual Abuse Report (2023). Retrieved from: commissionofinquiry.tas.gov.au/report
[32] Laurel House (2024). Consultation report to inform development of Tasmania’s Child Sexual Abuse Reform Strategy, prepared by Moodie T and Smith E. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[33] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2014). Indigenous child safety Retrieved from: aihw.gov.au/reports/indigenous-australians/indigenous-child-safety/summary
[34] Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability (2021). People with disability face much greater risk of violence than people without disability – 16 March 2021. Retrieved from: disability.royalcommission.gov.au/news-and-media/media-releases/people-disability-face-much-greater-risk-violence-people-without-disability
[35] Micić V, Micić I, Budiša M, et al. Mental disorders in sexually abused children. Psychiatr Danub. 2020;32(Suppl 3):349-353. Retrieved from: psychiatria-danubina.com/UserDocsImages/pdf/dnb_vol32_noSuppl%203/dnb_vol32_noSuppl%203_349.pdf
[36] Haslam D, Mathews B, Pacella R, Scott JG, Finkelhor D, Higgins DJ, Meinck F, Erskine HE, Thomas HJ, Lawrence D, Malacova E. (2023). The prevalence and impact of child maltreatment in Australia: Findings from the Australian Child Maltreatment Study: Brief Report. Australian Child Maltreatment Study, Queensland University of Technology, page 21. Retrieved from: www.acms.au/resources/the-prevalence-and-impact-of-child-maltreatment-in-australia-findings-from-the-australian-child-maltreatment-study-2023-brief-report/
[37] Higgins, DJ, Lawrence, D, Haslam, D M, Mathews, B, Malacova, E, Erskine, HE, Finkelhor, D, Pacella, R, Meinck, F, Thomas, HJ, and Scott, JG. (2024). ‘Prevalence of Diverse Genders and Sexualities in Australia and Associations With Five Forms of Child Maltreatment and Multi-type Maltreatment’. Child Maltreatment. Retrieved from: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10775595231226331
[38] Australian Government, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Child Sexual Abuse. Retrieved from: aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/types-of-violence/child-sexual-abuse
[39] Folket Consultancy (2024). Tasmania’s Connectedness: A Source of Strength or a Tool of Silence? Page 6. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[40] Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017), Final Report, Volume 2 – Nature and causes. Retrieved from: childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/final-report
[41] Laurel House (2024). Consultation report to inform development of Tasmania’s Child Sexual Abuse Reform Strategy, prepared by Moodie T and Smith E, page 106. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[42] Sexual Assault Support Service (2024). What Matters Most – Child Sexual Abuse Reform 2024, prepared by MacSween M., approved by Doherty, S. Page 16. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[43] Australian Human Rights Commission (2018). National Principles for Child Safe Organisations. Retrieved from: childsafe.humanrights.gov.au/national-principles
[44] Child and Youth Safe Organisations Act 2023. Retrieved from: www.legislation.tas.gov.au/view/whole/html/asmade/act-2023-006
[45] United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and International Rescue Committee (IRC), 2023). Caring for Child Survivors of Sexual Abuse Guidelines, Second Edition, UNICEF, New York. Retrieved from: unicef.org/media/155226/file/CCS%20Guidelines%20Final%20.pdf
[46] Criminal Code Act 1924 (Tas) section 1A. Retrieved from: www.legislation.tas.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1924-069
[47] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Child protection. Retrieved from: www.aihw.gov.au/reports/child-protection/child-protection-system-in-australia
[48] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[49] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: https://www.childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[50] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[51] Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017). Final report – identifying and disclosing child sexual abuse, Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Retrieved from: childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/identifying-and-disclosing-child-sexual-abuse
[52] MacSween, M., Melhem M., Petridis, T., (2024). Experts By Experience: What we can learn from Commission of Inquiry Case Studies. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[53] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[54] R Williams, ‘Cultural safety: what does it mean for our work practice?’ Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2008, 23(2):213–214.
[55] Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse 2017, Final Report: Our Inquiry – Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Volume 1, page 322.
[56] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[57] P Sawrikar and I Katz, How useful is the term ‘Culturally and Linguistically Diverse’ (CALD) in Australian research, practice and policy discourse? 2009, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Australia.
[58] P Mousaferiadis, Beyond CALD (Part 1): Why ‘culturally and linguistically diverse’ has had its day.
[59] Cambridge Dictionary Online (2024). Meaning of empowerment in English. Retrieved from: dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/empowerment
[60] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[61] Ibid.
[62] Smith, C. P.. Freyd, J. J. (2013). ‘Dangerous Safe Havens: Institutional Betrayal Exacerbates Sexual Trauma’. Journal of Traumatic Stress. Retrieved from: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23417879
[63] MacSween, M., Melhem, M., Petridis, T. (2024). Experts By Experience: What we can learn from Commission of Inquiry Case Studies. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[64] Australian Government (2021). National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2021-2030. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-prevent-and-respond-child-sexual-abuse-2021-2030
[65] Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse. Page 48. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse
[66] Ibid.
[67] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[68] Ibid.
[69] Ibid.
[70] Australian Government (2021). Australia’s Disability Strategy 2021-2031. Retrieved from: disabilitygateway.gov.au/ads/strategy
[71] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[72] Ibid.
[73] Victorian Government, A framework for place-based approaches, p. 12. Retrieved from: vic.gov.au/framework-place-based-approaches
[74] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[75] Ibid.
[76] Ibid.
[77] Ibid.
[78] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Personal Safety, Australia, 2017, ABS Canberra.
[79] Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse, pp. 30-34. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse
[80] Australian Government (2024). National Strategy’s Second Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from: childsafety.gov.au/resources/national-strategy-second-annual-report-2024
[81] Work Health and Safety Act (Tas) 2012. Retrieved from: legislation.tas.gov.au/view/whole/html/asmade/act-2012-001
[82] Laurel House (2024). Consultation report to inform development of Tasmania’s Child Sexual Abuse Reform Strategy, prepared by Moodie T and Smith E, page 3. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[83] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2024). Child Sexual Abuse. Retrieved from: aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/types-of-violence/child-sexual-abuse#mental-health
[84] Sexual Assault Support Service (2024). What Matters Most – Child Sexual Abuse Reform 2024, prepared by MacSween M., approved by Doherty, S. Page 16. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[85] Australian Institute for Health and Welfare (2024), Family, domestic and sexual violence: Child sexual abuse. Retrieved from: aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/types-of-violence/child-sexual-abuse ; and Assink M, van der Put CE, Meeuwsen MWCM, de Jong NM, Oort FJ, Stams GJJM, Hoeve M. Risk factors for child sexual abuse victimization: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2019 May;145(5):459-489. Retrieved from: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30777768/
[86] Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017), Final Report, Volume 2 – Nature and causes. Retrieved from: childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/final-report
[87] Mathews, B., Finkelhor, D., et al. (2024) Child sexual abuse by different classes and types of perpetrator: Prevalence and trends from an Australian national survey,
Child Abuse & Neglect. Retrieved from: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213423005501?via%3Dihub
[88] Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse 2017, Final Report: Preface and executive summary – Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, page 1.
[89] Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse. Page 49. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse
[90] Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse. Page 27. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse ;
[91] Men are overwhelmingly the main perpetrators of child sexual abuse in authority or caregiving roles, within families, and involving online offenses. See: Mathews, B., Finkelhor, D., et al. (2024) Child sexual abuse by different classes and types of perpetrator: Prevalence and trends from an Australian national survey,
Child Abuse & Neglect. Retrieved from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213423005501?via%3Dihub
[92] Salter, M., Woodluckl, D., Whitten, T., (2023) Identifying and understanding child sexual offending behaviours and attitudes among Australian men. Australian Human Rights Institute. Retrieved from: humanrights.unsw.edu.au/research/current-research/understanding-online-child-exploitation-practices
[93] Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse 2017, Final Report: Nature and cause – Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse Volume 2
[94] National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse, Sexual behaviours displayed by children and young people that can be harmful. Retrieved from: nationalcentre.org.au/resource/sexual-behaviours-displayed-by-children-and-young-people-that-can-be-harmful/
[95] Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse 2017, Final Report: Children with harmful sexual behaviours - Volume 10, pp. 79-80.
[96] Ibid, pp. 56-67; and McKibbin et al. (2024) Pathways to onset of Harmful Sexual Behaviour, Victims and Offenders Vol 19 (5), 739-777. Retrieved from: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15564886.2023.2208579#abstract
[97] Mathews, B., Finkelhor, D., et al. (2024) Child sexual abuse by different classes and types of perpetrator: Prevalence and trends from an Australian national survey, Child Abuse & Neglect. Retrieved from: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0145213423005501?via%3Dihub
[98] Salter, M., Woodluckl, D., Whitten, T., (2023) Identifying and understanding child sexual offending behaviours and attitudes among Australian men. Australian Human Rights Institute. Retrieved from: humanrights.unsw.edu.au/research/current-research/understanding-online-child-exploitation-practices
[99] McKibbin et al. (2024) Pathways to onset of Harmful Sexual Behaviour, Victims and Offenders Vol 19 (5), 739-777. Retrieved from: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15564886.2023.2208579#abstract
[100] Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse, pp. 30-34. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse
[101] Gibbs, A., Dunkle, K., Ramsoomar, L., Willan, S., Jama Shai, N., Chatterji, S., … Jewkes, R. (2020). New learnings on drivers of men’s physical and/or sexual violence against their female partners, and women’s experiences of this, and the implications for prevention interventions. Global Health Action, 13(1). doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1739845
[102] Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse, pp. 53-66. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse
[103] Australian Institute for Health and Welfare (2024), Family, domestic and sexual violence: Child sexual abuse. Retrieved from: aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/types-of-violence/child-sexual-abuse; Assink M, van der Put CE, Meeuwsen MWCM, de Jong NM, Oort FJ, Stams GJJM, Hoeve M. Risk factors for child sexual abuse victimization: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2019 May;145(5):459-489. Retrieved from: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30777768/; Haslam D, Mathews B, Pacella R, Scott JG, Finkelhor D, Higgins DJ, Meinck F, Erskine HE, Thomas HJ, Lawrence D, Malacova E. (2023). The prevalence and impact of child maltreatment in Australia: Findings from the Australian Child Maltreatment Study: Brief Report. Australian Child Maltreatment Study, Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved from: acms.au/resources/the-prevalence-and-impact-of-child-maltreatment-in-australia-findings-from-the-australian-child-maltreatment-study-2023-brief-report/; McKibbin et al. (2024) Pathways to onset of Harmful Sexual Behaviour, Victims and Offenders Vol 19 (5), 739-777. Retrieved from: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15564886.2023.2208579#abstract; Australian Institute of Family Studies (2015). Conceptualising the prevention of child sexual abuse. Retrieved from: aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/conceptualising-prevention-child-sexual-abuse; Men are overwhelmingly the main perpetrators of child sexual abuse in authority or caregiving roles, within families, and involving online offenses. See: Mathews, B., Finkelhor, D., et al. (2024) Child sexual abuse by different classes and types of perpetrator: Prevalence and trends from an Australian national survey, Child Abuse & Neglect; and Salter, M., Woodluckl, D., Whitten, T., (2023) Identifying and understanding child sexual offending behaviours and attitudes among Australian men. Australian Human Rights Institute. Retrieved from: humanrights.unsw.edu.au/research/current-research/understanding-online-child-exploitation-practices; Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse 2017, Final Report: Nature and cause – Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse Volume 2; O'Brien, W. (2010). Australia's response to sexualised or sexually abusive behaviours in children and young people. Canberra: Australian Crime Commission. Retrieved from dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30065114/obrien- australias-2010.pdf
[104] Sexual Assault Support Service (2024). What Matters Most – Child Sexual Abuse Reform 2024, prepared by MacSween M., approved by Doherty, S. Page 20. Retrieved from: keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au
[105] Mathews, B., Meinck, F., Erskine, H. E., Tran, N., Le, H., Kellard, K., et al. (2023). Adaptation and validation of the juvenile victimization questionnaire-R2 for a national study of child maltreatment in Australia. Child Abuse & Neglect, 139, Article 106093. Retrieved from: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213423000741
[106] Australian Institute of Criminology, (2024) New research highlights prevalence of family and domestic violence offending dealt with by police. Retrieved from: aic.gov.au/media-centre/news/new-research-highlights-prevalence-family-and-domestic-violence-offending-dealt-police
[107] Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017), Final Report – Preface and Summary. Page 9. Retrieved from: childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/final-report
[108] Olejnikova, L., Dragiewicz, M., Woodlock, D., Salter., M. (2024) Co-occurrence of domestic and family violence and child sexual abuse: Fact sheet. Childlight & University of New South Wales. Retrieved from: linkedin.com/posts/michael-salter-335330161_domestic-violence-and-child-sexual-abuse-activity-7262231220309110784-xBIk
[109] McKibbin et al. (2024) Pathways to onset of Harmful Sexual Behaviour, Victims and Offenders Vol 19 (5), 739-777. Retrieved from: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15564886.2023.2208579#abstract
Companion documents
We sincerely appreciate the contributions of everyone involved in developing this strategy. Without your wisdom and knowledge, we could not have developed this strategy to inspire and achieve real and meaningful Change for Children. Our primary consultation partners and companion documents to this strategy are detailed below.
3P Advisory
Systems Change – What works in public service environments? Scan of literature
Commissioner for Children and Young People
A decade on Children's voices on Child Safety
The Voices for Tasmanian Youth
Communicate with us, not at us!
Everettsmith (Mina nina), Wilcox (Cooee tunapri)
Kani paliti: Aboriginal Cultural Safety Commitment Statement, Keeping Children Safe
Folket Consultancy
Analysis of Past Inquiries into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse
Tasmania’s Connectedness: A source of strength or a tool of silence?
Laurel House
Consultation report to inform development of Tasmania’s Child Sexual Abuse Reform Strategy
MacSween, Melhem and Petridis
Experts by Experience: What we can learn from the Commission of Inquiry Case Studies
Neighbourhood Houses Tasmania
Place-based prevention of child sexual abuse: a Neighbourhood House perspective
Sexual Assault Support Service
Child Sexual Abuse Reform 2024: What Matters Most
Tasmanian Council of Social Services
TasCOSS Input to the Child Sexual Abuse Strategy and Action Plan
Tasmanian Family and Sexual Violence Alliance
University of Tasmania
A comparative review of child sexual abuse definitions
A comparative review of strategies to prevent and respond to child sexual abuse
Van den Berg and Banks
Response to Keeping Children Safe and Rebuilding Trust – Ecosystem mapping
Strategy companion documents
The following companion documents were created by the Department of Premier and Cabinet to be read alongside Change for Children.
Companion document: Theory of Change
Companion document: Understanding child sexual abuse: prevalence, risk factors and drivers
Public submissions
We have been consulting with the community on the draft Change for Children strategy. Public submissions were open between 27 June 2024 and 30 September 2024. As per the Tasmanian Government’s Public Submissions Policy, submissions are published below, e excluding personal, defamatory or offensive information, or information that authors have requested remains confidential. Please refer to the policy for more information.
We thank all those who provided submissions and contributed their experiences and expertise through the public feedback process.
Public submissions (in alphabetical order)
Centre for Excellence in Child and Family Welfare
Circular Head Aboriginal Corporation
Commissioner for Children and Young People
Local Government Association of Tasmania
Mental Health Council of Tasmania
Office of the Independent Regulator
Relationships Australia Tasmania
Sexual Assault Support Service